THE GOVERNMENT OF MOSCOW
Committee of the city of Moscow on pricing policy in construction
and state expertise of projects
OBJECTS OF IMPROVEMENT AND URBAN ENVIRONMENT
Collection 7.2
LOCATION AND INSTALLATION
MONUMENTS AND MONUMENTS
(INCLUDING STELES, BUSTS, SCULPTURES)
MRR-7.2-16
Collection 7.2 “Placement and installation of monuments and monuments (including stelae, busts, sculptures). MRR-7.2-16" (hereinafter referred to as the Collection) was developed by the specialists of GAU "NIAC" (S.V. Lakhaev, E.A. Igoshin, A.M. Vaynerman) with the participation of specialists of JSC "Mosproekt-3" (Kostryukova E.E. .).
The collection was approved and put into effect on January 9, 2017 by order of the Committee of the City of Moscow on pricing policy in construction and state examination of projects dated December 29, 2016 No. MKE-OD / 16-75.
The collection is an integral part of the Unified Regulatory Framework of the MRR.
The collection was developed to replace MRR-3.2.15.04-16 (section 2).
Introduction
1. General Provisions
2. Basic principles for the formation of base prices for an architectural and construction project for the placement and installation of monuments and the improvement of the territory adjacent to them
3. Methodology for determining the cost of developing an architectural and construction project for the placement and installation of monuments and the improvement of the territory adjacent to them
4. Base prices and adjustment factors
Application. Examples of calculating the cost of work
INTRODUCTION
This Collection 7.2 “Placement and installation of monuments and monuments (including stelae, busts, sculptures). MRR-7.2-16" (hereinafter referred to as the Collection) was developed in accordance with the state task.
This Collection is intended for use by state customers, design and other interested organizations when calculating the initial (maximum) prices of contracts and determining the cost of developing architectural and construction projects for the placement and installation of monuments and monuments, the improvement of the territory adjacent to them, carried out with the involvement of funds from the budget of the city of Moscow.
When developing the Collection, the following regulatory and methodological documents were used:
Urban Planning Code of the Russian Federation;
Urban planning code of the city of Moscow;
Water Code of the Russian Federation;
Law of the city of Moscow dated November 13, 1998 No. 30 “On the procedure for erecting works of monumental and decorative art of urban significance in the city of Moscow”;
Decree of the Government of Moscow dated September 02, 2003 No. 746-PP “On the General Scheme for the Comprehensive Improvement of the City of Moscow”;
Decree of the Government of Moscow dated August 31, 2006 No. 1713-RP “On the procedure for financing the comprehensive improvement of territories adjacent to works of monumental art newly installed in the city of Moscow”;
Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation dated February 16, 2008 No. 87 “On the composition of sections of project documentation and requirements for their content”;
Collection 1.1 “General guidelines for the application of the Moscow regional recommendations. MRR-1.1-16".
Collection 2.5 “Materials for the substantiation of urban planning plans for land plots. MPP-2.5-16";
Collection 3.6 “Inspection and monitoring of the technical condition of building structures and engineering equipment of buildings and structures. MRR-3.6-16";
Collection 4.1 “Capital construction projects. MPP-4.1-16";
Collection 6.2 “Measures to ensure fire safety. MPP-6.2-16";
Collection 9.1 “Methodology for calculating the cost of scientific, regulatory, methodological, design and other types of work (services) based on normalized labor costs. MRR-9.1-16";
- “Recommendations on determining the amount of remuneration (fee) of the author (creative team) for the creation of works of fine art, artistic design and construction, scenarios of works. MRR-3.2.08.03-11";
Collection 9.5 “Demonstration materials. MRR-9.5-16";
- "Handbook of basic prices for the development of design documentation for custom-made equipment" (approved by the letter of the Gosstroy of Russia dated June 16, 1998 No. 9-10-17 / 33).
1. GENERAL PROVISIONS
1.1. This Collection is a methodological basis for determining the cost of developing an architectural and construction project for the placement and installation of monuments, the improvement of the territory adjacent to them for the city of Moscow.
1.2. The cost of the main design work is determined depending on the architectural, artistic and volumetric-spatial images, as well as engineering and technical solutions.
1.3. When determining the cost of work on the basis of this Collection, one should also be guided by the provisions of Collection 1. 1 “General guidelines for the application of the Moscow regional recommendations. MRR-1.1-16".
1.4. Bringing the base cost of work, determined in accordance with this Collection, to the current price level is carried out by applying the conversion factor (inflationary change), approved in the prescribed manner.
1.5. The distribution of the cost of the main design work by type of documentation is presented in Table 1.1
Table 1.1
|
Types of documentation |
Share of the cost of the main design works (in %) |
|
|
Project documentation (P) |
||
|
Working documentation (P) |
||
|
Design and working documentation (P+R)* |
* This line is included for reference to determine the total cost of developing design and working documentation (if necessary).
1.6. The recommended distribution of the relative cost of design work by sections of design documentation is presented in Table 3.2 of this Collection. In each specific case, it can be specified in accordance with the established practice of relative distribution in the design organization.
1.7. The base prices of the Collection take into account and do not require additional payment the costs of performing the work listed in paragraphs 3.3-3.5 of MRR-1.1-16, as well as:
Participation in the preparation of design assignments (excluding the technological assignment);
Participation together with the customer in the mandatory approval of project documentation.
1.8. The base prices do not take into account the work performed under separate contracts with the customer and paid at the expense of funds for its maintenance:
Collection of initial data;
Obtaining additional to mandatory approvals of design decisions.
1.9. The base prices of the Collection also do not take into account the associated costs specified in clause 3.6 of MRR-1.1-16.
2. MAIN PRINCIPLES OF FORMING BASIC PRICES FOR ARCHITECTURAL AND CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS FOR PLACEMENT AND INSTALLATION OF MONUMENTS AND IMPROVEMENT OF THE TERRITORY ADJACENT TO THEM
2.1. The Collection contains basic prices for determining the cost of development:
Individual projects for the placement and installation of monuments;
Monument reconstruction projects.
2.2. The architectural and construction project for the placement, installation of the monument as part of the construction provides:
Placement and arrangement of the foundation;
Installation with fastening of the monument (pedestal, podium);
Facing of a pedestal, monument, stairs, retaining walls, square parapets, etc.
2.3. A variety of types of work on the installation and placement of monuments does not allow choosing a natural indicator that is the same for all types of monuments and is used to form the value of the base price of design work.
2.4. The object itself is used as a natural indicator in the formation of the base price of design work, i.e. each type of monument, taking into account its monumental and figurative solution (Table 2.1).
Table 2.1
Natural indicators by types of monuments
|
Object name |
The main natural indicator of the object |
|
|
memorial sign |
Monument |
|
|
Monument |
||
|
Monument |
||
|
Sculpture |
Monument |
|
|
sculptural composition |
sculptural composition |
|
|
Memorial |
sculptural composition |
2.5. For design work on the installation and placement of the type of monument - commemorative plaques - the base price is not given. In this case, an author's contract is drawn up and a royalty system of remuneration is used.
2.6. The calculation of the base cost of design work for each type of monument is carried out using the "Classifier" of design complexity categories.
The base prices given in the Collection for design work on the placement and installation of monuments correspond to the II category of complexity with a coefficient K sl = 1.0.
Table 2.2
|
The relief (site) is flat The soils are not subsiding, there is no groundwater |
Relief with a slope of 10° Bulk, subsidence, water-saturated soils |
Relief with a slope of more than 10° Heaving soils with karst phenomena, with archaeological layers (elements) |
|
Prefabricated monolithic reinforced concrete foundations |
Monolithic slab |
Pile foundations: Brown-stuffed; W / concrete; With monolithic grillage |
|
Monolithic reinforced concrete pedestal without cladding |
Also with fastening of cladding plates |
Also with the use of facing blocks |
|
Mounting of the monument with anchoring in the array of the foundation or pedestal |
The device of metal structures for fixing a sculpture with a pedestal |
Same with the foundation. |
|
The shape of the pedestal - rectangular outlines |
Also, partially curvilinear |
The predominance of a curvilinear shape |
|
Facing homogeneous, one-color surface material, without its ornamental and plastic processing |
Homogeneous surface material, with partial color and plastic processing |
Inhomogeneous surface material, with color plastic and ornamental processing |
3. METHODOLOGY FOR DETERMINING THE COST OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ARCHITECTURAL CONSTRUCTION PROJECT OF PLACEMENT AND INSTALLATION OF MONUMENTS AND IMPROVEMENT OF THE TERRITORY ADJACENT TO THEM
3.1. This section of the Collection is a methodological basis for determining the cost of developing an architectural and construction project for the placement and installation of monuments and the improvement of the territory adjacent to them.
3.2. The cost of the main design work for the placement and installation of monuments, determined on the basis of this Collection, takes into account:
Detailed development of elements from natural stone, metal and other natural materials;
Landscaping within the boundaries of the allotted area (landscaping, outdoor lighting, etc.).
3.3. The following works are not included in the base prices for design work on the placement and installation of monuments and are subject to additional payment (provided that these works are included in the design assignment):
Artistic works, sculptural and monumental-decorative compositions (under a separate agreement);
Experimental work;
Engineering and environmental surveys;
Relaying, laying engineering networks (except for cable for outdoor lighting);
Technical survey and measuring work of existing monuments during reconstruction;
Development of an architectural lighting project for the formation of a light environment and the creation of light ensembles;
Design of fountains and other water devices;
Development of the section "List of measures for environmental protection";
Development of design solutions in several versions;
Development of design documentation for the manufacture of non-standardized equipment in accordance with the design assignment;
Improvement of the territory outside the boundaries of the site allocated for the installation of the monument;
Adjustment of design documentation in connection with a change in the design assignment or a change in the regulatory design documentation;
Development of the section "Measures to ensure fire safety";
Development of the section "Measures to ensure access for persons with disabilities".
The cost of additional work is determined according to the relevant MRR collections and other regulatory and methodological documents on pricing in design, taking into account the coefficient for the scope of work or on the basis of normalized labor costs.
3.4. The base cost of the main design work for the architectural and construction project for the placement and installation of monuments and for the improvement of the territory adjacent to them is determined by the following formula:
C (b)- base price of the main design works (determined according to tables 4.1-4.5);
K in- coefficient taking into account the type of documentation being developed (determined according to table 1.1);
K Wed- coefficient taking into account the composition of the sections of the documentation being developed (determined in agreement with the customer in accordance with the relative distribution of the cost of work presented in table 3.2);
The product of correction factors that take into account complicating (simplifying) factors and design conditions. The product of all corrective coefficients (except for the coefficient taking into account the type of reconstruction of the existing facility and the coefficient taking into account the reduction in design time) should not exceed 2.0.
3.5. Table 3.2 shows the relative cost of sections of design documentation for the implementation of an architectural and construction project for the placement and installation of monuments and the improvement of the territory adjacent to them.
Table 3.2
Table of relative cost of sections of project documentation
|
Project documentation section |
The share of the cost of the section in the base price of the main design work (%) |
|
|
Architectural and planning solution (General plan) |
||
|
Architectural solutions |
||
|
Constructive decisions |
||
|
Landscaping (landscaping, outdoor lighting, etc.) |
||
|
Organization of construction (POS) |
||
|
Estimated documentation (local, object estimates, consolidated estimate calculation) |
||
3.6. The cost of additional work performed on behalf of the customer and paid at the expense of funds for its maintenance is determined as a percentage of the cost of the main design work:
Collection of initial data for design - 2%;
Preparation of material for the draft resolution of the Government of Moscow on the installation of monuments:
a) graphic material (sketches, diagrams, etc.) - 5%;
b) text material - 2%.
4. BASE PRICES AND ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
4.1. Base prices for design work on the installation of monuments and landscaping are given in tables 4.1-4.5.
Table 4.1
Table 4.2
|
Name of the monument |
Base prices (thousand rubles) |
||
|
Stele height: |
Monument |
||
|
12 m and more |
Note: within the boundaries of the indicated ranges of stele height values, the value of the base price is determined by interpolation.
Table 4.3
|
Name of the monument |
Natural indicator of the object |
Base prices (thousand rubles) |
|
|
Sculpture area (podium area) |
Monument |
||
|
250 sq.m and more |
Notes:
1. Within the boundaries of the designated intervals of the podium area of the monument, the value of the base price is determined by interpolation.
2. In the absence of a podium, the base price is determined in accordance with the area of the pedestal.
Table 4.4
|
Name of the monument |
Natural indicator of the object |
Base prices (thousand rubles) |
|
|
Sculptural composition with the number of composition elements (with relief elements), pcs.: |
sculptural composition |
||
|
10 or more |
Note: within the boundaries of the indicated intervals of the elements of the composition, the value of the base price is determined by interpolation.
Table 4.5
|
Name of the monument |
Natural indicator of the object |
Base prices (thousand rubles) |
|
|
Memorial number of composition elements (with relief elements), pcs.: |
sculptural composition |
||
|
12 or more |
Note: within the boundaries of the indicated intervals of the elements of the composition, the value of the base price is determined by interpolation.
4.2. The cost of the main design works for the reconstruction of monuments is calculated taking into account the coefficients given in Table 4.6 for those sections of the project that relate to reconstruction.
Table 4.6
4.3. When designing monuments in difficult conditions of inclusion in the environment, the cost of the main design work is determined taking into account the coefficients given in Table 4.7 of this Collection.
Table 4.7
Factors affecting the complexity of the design, and the values of the coefficients that take into account the complex conditions for the inclusion of an object in the environment
|
Factors affecting the complexity of design |
Coefficient values |
|
|
An object on the territory of a zone of protection of a cultural heritage object or a historical zone (on the territory or in close proximity to historical and cultural monuments, except for the zone of a protected natural landscape) |
||
|
An object on the territory of a protected natural landscape zone (landscape ensembles, parks, gardens, protected areas, squares, territories of natural complexes, etc.) |
||
|
Crowded area (in accordance with the design assignment); the presence of nearby existing buildings and a dense network of underground utilities that require additional measures to create conditions for the location of the facility; on terrain with slopes greater than 30 ppm |
||
|
The presence of a stressful mode of urban transport (ground and underground) in the immediate vicinity of the designed facility, requiring additional measures to reduce vibration, etc. |
Note: the coefficients for items 1-2 of the table are applied to the cost of designing monuments for the following sections: master plan, architectural solutions, landscaping and construction site. Simultaneous application of coefficients is not allowed.
APPENDIX
Examples of calculating the cost of work
Example 1
The project for the installation of the monument to P.P. Melnikov with the improvement of the adjacent territory.
This type of monument is regarded as a sculpture, referred to the II category of complexity. The monument is located in the historical zone. The area of the monument is 100 m2.
The base cost of design work with the improvement of the adjacent territory is determined in accordance with formula (3.1):
P (b) = 459.0 - base price of the main design work (determined according to table 4.3);
0.370 - share of the cost of developing design solutions (table 3.2);
C (t) \u003d 536.80 x 3.533 \u003d 1,896.51 thousand rubles,
where K per = 3.533 is the conversion factor (inflationary change) of the base cost of design work in the current price level of the IV quarter of 2016 to the prices of 2000 (according to the order of Moscomexpertiza dated 21.01.2016 No. MKE-OD / 16-1).
Example 2
The project of installing a monument to the residents of the Central Administrative District - participants in the Second World War with the improvement of the adjacent territory.
This type of monument is regarded as a sculptural composition consisting of 4 elements, referred to the II category of complexity.
The monument is located in the historical zone.
The base cost of design work with the improvement of the adjacent territory is determined in accordance with formula 3.1.
P (b) = 677.0 - the base price of the main design work (determined according to table 4.4);
K in \u003d 1.0 - coefficient taking into account the type of documentation being developed (determined according to table 1.1);
0.565 - share of the cost of developing an architectural and planning solution: general plan (10.5%), architectural solution (25.5%); share of the cost of landscaping the adjacent territory (16.5%), PIC (4.0%) according to table 3.2;
0.370 - share of the cost of developing design solutions table (3.2);
0.065 - share of the cost of the estimate documentation (table 3.2);
K=1.3 - the object is located in the historical zone (point 1 of Table 4.7 and note to Table 4.7).
The design cost at current prices is determined by the formula (4.1) of the “General Guidelines for the Application of the Moscow Regional Recommendations. MPP-1.1-16 "and is
C (t) \u003d 791.75 x 3.533 \u003d 2797.25 thousand rubles,
where K per = 3.533 is the conversion factor (inflationary change) of the base cost of design work in the current price level of the IV quarter of 2016 to the prices of 2000 (according to the order of Moscomexpertiza dated 21.01.2016 No. MKE-OD / 16-1).
The cost of the estimate for restoration depends primarily on the volume and complexity of the project and the completeness of the initial data.
To clarify the cost and timing, please contact our specialist by phone: 959-69-54 .
Restoration of architectural monuments is a very narrow and professional field of construction production, the same can be said about estimates for restoration work.
The foundation of a competent estimate is the degree of elaboration of the initial data, and first of all, the defective statement. A feature of the preparation of estimates for restoration is that many related works are not listed in the defective statement, but they must be added to the estimate, because they will definitely need to be done upon completion.
For example, "work to recreate the plaster" is always a beating of the plaster, and cleaning and strengthening the masonry. Our experts are well aware of the composition of the actual work and, having worked out the defective statement in detail, they will take into account all the hidden nuances.
The main difficulty in marking restoration work is the knowledge of restoration technologies.
Our estimators have experience in restoration work. Specialists of the "Smeta-Online" company participated in the reconstruction of many architectural monuments. For us, the names of prices from the restoration base are not an empty phrase, but real work performed using a specific technology.
Restoration prices are compiled in such a way that the operations accounted for by them intersect, so you need to maneuver with the percentage of restoration in order to reach the desired cost estimate.
Some of the work is not priced at all. Fully aware of the technological process, we are ready to select the prices applicable.
For example, the reconstruction of DPI from papier-mâché - in principle, there are no prices for such work. We have to combine prices for stucco, painting and woven works, reaching the amount required by the Customer, while maintaining a balance of labor costs.
The special skill of the estimator-restorer is not to miss small related works, which entail a significant increase in cost.
For example: additional cleaning with washes, cleaning of undercuts, manufacturing of fasteners for mounting restored handles, cutting sprues after casting from cast iron, adding a percentage to the sprues to the weight of the cast part.
The estimate for restoration is always budgetary money, which means that there is always strict control and a decrease in the estimated cost. We are ready to work with the inspection bodies and with the estimate before its approval.
Let's calculate the volumes for the project - the areas of facades and interiors, stucco, rustication, art painting, etc. We are ready to go to the site, calculate the scope of work for the project. You can be sure that if the amount of restoration work can be calculated - we will calculate it!
| Restoration | ||
|---|---|---|
| Estimate for the restoration of ceramic decor | The estimate describes in detail the entire complex of works on the restoration of ceramic, stucco and wooden decor on the facade of one of the historical monuments of St. Petersburg. An example of a detailed defective statement is attached to the estimate, which is a justification for the scope of work. | Download |
| Quote for tile restoration | The estimate describes in detail the entire complex of works on the restoration of ceramic tile coatings on one of the historical monuments of St. Petersburg. An example of a detailed defective statement is attached to the estimate, which is a justification for the scope of work. | Download |
| Estimate for the restoration of the facade | The estimate describes in detail the entire complex of works on the restoration of the facade on one of the historical monuments of St. Petersburg. In addition to decorative elements, the estimate includes repair and strengthening of old paint, restoration of plaster and painting, rustication, pilasters, repair of the basement. An example of a detailed defective statement is attached to the estimate, which is a justification for the scope of work. |
Download |
Repair work is periodically required not only for buildings / structures, but also for monuments. A monument is a tribute to the dead or dead people, a keeper of their memory. In particular, this concerns the restoration of the memorial sign of the Great Patriotic War. In order to repair the WWII obelisk on a turnkey basis and not incur significant financial costs, it is necessary to draw up estimate documentation. This must be done after assessing the condition of the monument of the Great Patriotic War, so that the calculation is correct. The scope and depth of research may vary.
When drawing up an estimate for repairs, you must consider:
It is virtually impossible to calculate an estimate for the restoration of an architectural object on your own. It is better to turn to a professional estimator who knows what features there are when performing restoration work. They may assume:
An experienced specialist knows how to properly draw up an estimate so that the work is relatively inexpensive.
A competent estimator will easily navigate the regulatory framework, be able to analyze and select those documents that may affect the final estimated cost: it can be reduced in the interests of the customer.
Also, the calculation of the budget document should take into account:
Of course, finishing is the most expensive. They must have high wear resistance, cleanability and safety. At the same time, prices should be minimal.
It should be borne in mind that the repair of the monument is carried out exclusively with the knowledge of specialized bodies that are involved in the protection of monuments. Moreover, control is carried out not only when an estimate is made for repair work, but also in the process of their implementation.
Estimated documentation can be ordered from third-party specialists if there is no opportunity or special knowledge to do it yourself. You can calculate the work schedule for a certain time, if it is not possible to invest a large amount of funds at a time. With such a request, you need to contact the specialist who will calculate the estimate.
Freelance specialists can make an estimate for a reasonable price. They do not pay rent and do not need intermediary services, so their help is available to a wide range of people.
In particular, you can order the services of estimators on the Yudu online platform. In order for the performers to be able to quickly and efficiently calculate the estimate, you should submit an application on the website. This is done online. The assignment specifies:
An estimate for the repair of the monument to the Great Patriotic War will be developed within a day or two. In case of urgent need, the YouDo performer will be able to calculate faster. By the way, on the service you can order estimate documents for other objects.
| Placement of the order is carried out by a specialized organization | Committee for Urban Affairs of the Administration of the Municipal Formation Volosovsky Municipal District of the Leningrad Region |
| Mailing address | |
| The actual address | Russian Federation, 188410, Leningrad region, Volosovsky district, Volosovo city, Vingissara avenue, 57 |
| Telephone | 7-81373-24139 |
| Fax | 7-81373-21394 |
| [email protected] | |
| The contact person | Shisha Boris Nikolaevich |
| Subject of contract | Performance of work on the object: "Installation of the Monument to the Soldiers-Internationalists in the city of Volosovo" |
| Initial (maximum) contract price | RUB 200,000.00 |
| Quantity of goods, scope of works or services | 4540373; Performance of work on the object: "Installation of the Monument to the Soldiers-Internationalists in the city of Volosovo"; 1.0; Unit; 4540243; Performance of work on the object: "Installation of the Monument to the Soldiers-Internationalists in the city of Volosovo"; 1.0; Unit; 4520132; Performance of work on the object: "Installation of the Monument to the Soldiers-Internationalists in the city of Volosovo"; 1.0; Unit; |
| OKDP | |
| Place of delivery of goods, performance of work or provision of services | Russian Federation, 188410, Leningrad region, Volosovsky district, Volosovo city, Vingissara avenue, near house No. 42 |
| The term for the delivery of goods, performance of work or provision of services | The commencement of work execution is within 10 days after the signing of this Contract. Completion of work - no later than September 01, 2013. |
| Customer | Committee for Urban Affairs of the Administration of the Municipal Formation Volosovsky Municipal District of the Leningrad Region |
On Wednesday afternoon, heavy snow began to fall in the capital, visibility deteriorated, RIAMO correspondent reports. In the north of the capital, snow is falling in flakes.
The government of Moscow
COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF MOSCOW ON PRICE POLICY IN CONSTRUCTION AND STATE EXAMINATION OF PROJECTS
Chapter 7
Objects of improvement and urban environment
Placement and installation of monuments and monuments (including stelae, busts, sculptures)
Collection 7.2 "Placement and installation of monuments and monuments (including stelae, busts, sculptures). MRR-7.2-16" (hereinafter referred to as the Collection) was developed by the specialists of GAU "NIAC" (S.V. Lakhaev, E.A. Igoshin, A.M. Vaynerman) with the participation of specialists from Mosproekt-3 OJSC (E.E. Kostryukova).
The collection was approved and put into effect on January 9, 2017 by order of the Moscow City Committee for Pricing Policy in Construction and State Expertise of Projects dated December 29, 2016 N MKE-OD / 16-75.
The collection is an integral part of the Unified Regulatory Framework of the MRR.
The collection was developed to replace MRR-3.2.15.04-16 (section 2).
This Collection 7.2 "Placement and installation of monuments and monuments (including stelae, busts, sculptures). MRR-7.2-16" (hereinafter referred to as the Collection) was developed in accordance with the state assignment.
This Collection is intended for use by state customers, design and other interested organizations when calculating the initial (maximum) prices of contracts and determining the cost of developing architectural and construction projects for the placement and installation of monuments and monuments, the improvement of the territory adjacent to them, carried out with the involvement of funds from the budget of the city of Moscow.
When developing the Collection, the following regulatory and methodological documents were used:
- Urban Planning Code of the Russian Federation;
- Urban planning code of the city of Moscow;
- Water Code of the Russian Federation;
- Law of the city of Moscow dated November 13, 1998 N 30 "On the procedure for erecting in the city of Moscow works of monumental and decorative art of urban significance";
- Decree of the Government of Moscow dated September 02, 2003 N 746-PP "On the General Scheme for the Comprehensive Improvement of the City of Moscow";
- Decree of the Government of Moscow dated August 31, 2006 N 1713-RP "On the procedure for financing the comprehensive improvement of territories adjacent to the works of monumental art newly installed in the city of Moscow";
- Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of February 16, 2008 N 87 "On the composition of sections of project documentation and requirements for their content";
- Collection 1.1 "General instructions for the application of the Moscow regional recommendations. MRR-1.1-16".
- Collection 2.5 "Materials for the substantiation of urban planning plans for land plots. MRR-2.5-16";
- Collection 3.6 "Inspection and monitoring of the technical condition of building structures and engineering equipment of buildings and structures. MRR-3.6-16";
- Collection 4.1 "Capital construction projects. MRR-4.1-16";
- Collection 6.2 "Measures to ensure fire safety. MRR-6.2-16";
- Collection 9.1 "Methodology for calculating the cost of scientific, regulatory, methodological, design and other types of work (services) based on normalized labor costs. MRR-9.1-16";
- "Recommendations for determining the amount of remuneration (fee) of the author (creative team) for the creation of works of fine art, artistic design and construction, scenarios of works. MRR-3.2.08.03-11";
- Collection 9.5 "Demonstration materials. MRR-9.5-16";
- "Handbook of basic prices for the development of design documentation for custom-made equipment" (approved by the letter of the Gosstroy of Russia dated June 16, 1998 N 9-10-17 / 33).
1.1. This Collection is a methodological basis for determining the cost of developing an architectural and construction project for the placement and installation of monuments, the improvement of the territory adjacent to them for the city of Moscow.
1.2. The cost of the main design work is determined depending on the architectural, artistic and volumetric-spatial images, as well as engineering and technical solutions.
1.3. When determining the cost of work on the basis of this Collection, one should also be guided by the provisions of Collection 1.1 "General guidelines for the application of the Moscow regional recommendations. MRR-1.1-16" .
1.4. Bringing the base cost of work, determined in accordance with this Collection, to the current price level is carried out by applying the conversion factor (inflationary change), approved in the prescribed manner.
1.5. The distribution of the cost of the main design work by type of documentation is presented in Table 1.1
Table 1.1
Types of documentation | Share of the cost of the main design works (in %) |
|
Project documentation (P) | ||
Working documentation (P) | ||
Design and working documentation (P+R) * |
________________
* This line is included for reference to determine the total cost of developing design and working documentation (if necessary).
1.6. The recommended distribution of the relative cost of design work by sections of design documentation is presented in Table 3.2 of this Collection. In each specific case, it can be specified in accordance with the established practice of relative distribution in the design organization.
1.7. The base prices of the Collection take into account and do not require additional payment the costs of performing the work listed in paragraphs 3.3 -3.5 of MPP-1.1-16, as well as:
- participation in the preparation of design assignments (excluding the technological assignment);
- Participation together with the customer in the mandatory approval of project documentation.
1.8. The base prices do not take into account the work performed under separate contracts with the customer and paid at the expense of funds for its maintenance:
- collection of initial data;
- Obtaining additional to mandatory approvals of design decisions.
1.9. The base prices of the Collection also do not take into account the associated costs specified in clause 3.6 of MRR-1.1-16.
2.1. The Collection contains basic prices for determining the cost of development:
- individual projects for the placement and installation of monuments;
- projects for the reconstruction of monuments.
2.2. The architectural and construction project for the placement, installation of the monument as part of the construction provides:
- placement and arrangement of the foundation;
- installation with fastening of the monument (pedestal, podium);
- lining of a pedestal, monument, stairs, retaining walls, square parapets, etc.
2.3. A variety of types of work on the installation and placement of monuments does not allow choosing a natural indicator that is the same for all types of monuments and is used to form the value of the base price of design work.
2.4. The object itself is used as a natural indicator in the formation of the base price of design work, i.e. each type of monument, taking into account its monumental and figurative solution (Table 2.1).
Table 2.1
Natural indicators by types of monuments
Object name | Basic |
|
memorial sign | Monument |
|
Monument |
||
Monument |
||
Sculpture | Monument |
|
sculptural composition | sculptural composition |
|
Memorial | sculptural composition |
2.5. For design work on the installation and placement of the type of monument - commemorative plaques - the base price is not given. In this case, an author's contract is drawn up and a royalty system of remuneration is used.
2.6. The calculation of the base cost of design work for each type of monument is carried out using the "Classifier" of design complexity categories.
The base prices given in the Collection for design work on the placement and installation of monuments correspond to the II category of complexity with a coefficient = 1.0.
For other categories of complexity, the following coefficients are accepted:
Table 2.2
Classifier of categories of complexity of the architectural and construction project for the placement, installation of monuments and landscaping
The relief (platform) is flat Soils are not subsiding, groundwater is absent | Terrain with a slope of 10° Bulk soils, subsidence, water-saturated | Terrain with a slope of more than 10° Heaving soils with karst phenomena, with archaeological layers (elements) |
Prefabricated monolithic reinforced concrete foundations | Monolithic slab | Pile foundations: Brown-stuffed; W / concrete; With monolithic grillage |
Monolithic reinforced concrete pedestal without cladding | The same with fastening the cladding plates | The same with the use of facing blocks |
Mounting of the monument with anchoring in the array of the foundation or pedestal | The device of metal structures for fixing a sculpture with a pedestal | Same with the foundation. |
The shape of the pedestal - rectangular outlines | The same, partially curvilinear | The predominance of a curvilinear shape |
Facing homogeneous, one-color surface material, without its ornamental and plastic processing | Homogeneous surface material, with partial color and plastic processing | Inhomogeneous surface material, with color plastic and ornamental processing |
3.1. This section of the Collection is a methodological basis for determining the cost of developing an architectural and construction project for the placement and installation of monuments and the improvement of the territory adjacent to them.
3.2. The cost of the main design work for the placement and installation of monuments, determined on the basis of this Collection, takes into account:
- detailed development of elements from natural stone, metal and other natural materials;
- landscaping within the boundaries of the allotted area (landscaping, outdoor lighting, etc.).
3.3. The following works are not included in the base prices for design work on the placement and installation of monuments and are subject to additional payment (provided that these works are included in the design assignment):
- artwork, sculptural and monumental-decorative compositions (under a separate agreement);
- experimental work;
- engineering and environmental surveys;
- relocation, laying of engineering networks (except for cable for outdoor lighting);
- technical survey and measurement work of existing monuments during reconstruction;
- development of an architectural lighting project for the formation of a light environment and the creation of light ensembles;
- design of fountains and other water devices;
- development of the section "List of measures for environmental protection";
- development of design solutions in several versions;
- development of design documentation for the manufacture of non-standardized equipment in accordance with the design assignment;
- landscaping of the territory outside the boundaries of the site allocated for the installation of the monument;
- Realization of architectural supervision of construction;
- adjustment of the project documentation in connection with a change in the design assignment or a change in the regulatory documentation for the design;
- development of the section "Measures to ensure fire safety";
- development of the section "Measures to ensure access for persons with disabilities".
The cost of additional work is determined according to the relevant MRR collections and other regulatory and methodological documents on pricing in design, taking into account the coefficient for the scope of work or on the basis of normalized labor costs.
3.4. The base cost of the main design work for the architectural and construction project for the placement and installation of monuments and for the improvement of the territory adjacent to them is determined by the following formula:
where
- base price of the main design works (determined according to tables 4.1-4.5);
- coefficient taking into account the type of documentation being developed (determined according to table 1.1);
- coefficient taking into account the composition of the sections of the documentation being developed (determined in agreement with the customer in accordance with the relative distribution of the cost of work presented in table 3.2);
- the product of correction factors that take into account complicating (simplifying) factors and design conditions.
The product of all corrective coefficients (except for the coefficient taking into account the type of reconstruction of the existing facility and the coefficient taking into account the reduction in design time) should not exceed 2.0.
3.5. Table 3.2 shows the relative cost of sections of design documentation for the implementation of an architectural and construction project for the placement and installation of monuments and the improvement of the territory adjacent to them.
Table 3.2
Table of relative cost of sections of project documentation
Project documentation section | The share of the cost of the section in the base price of the main design work (%) |
|
Architectural and planning solution (General plan) | ||
Architectural solutions | ||
Constructive decisions | ||
Landscaping (landscaping, outdoor lighting, etc.) | ||
Organization of construction (POS) | ||
Estimated documentation (local, object estimates, consolidated estimate calculation) | ||
3.6. The cost of additional work performed on behalf of the customer and paid at the expense of funds for its maintenance is determined as a percentage of the cost of the main design work:
- collection of initial data for design - 2%;
- preparation of material for the draft resolution of the Government of Moscow on the installation of monuments:
a) graphic material (sketches, diagrams, etc.) - 5%;
b) text material - 2%.
4.1. Base prices for design work on the installation of monuments and landscaping are given in tables 4.1-4.5.
Table 4.1
Name of the monument | Natural indicator of the object | Base prices (thousand rubles) |
|
memorial sign | Monument | ||
Monument |
Table 4.2
Name of the monument | Natural indicator of the object | Base prices (thousand rubles) |
|
Stele height: | Monument | ||
12 m and more |
Note: within the boundaries of the indicated ranges of stele height values, the value of the base price is determined by interpolation.
Table 4.3
Name of the monument | Natural indicator of the object | Base prices (thousand rubles) |
|
Sculpture area (podium area) | Monument | ||
250 sq.m and more |
Notes:
1. Within the boundaries of the designated intervals of the podium area of the monument, the value of the base price is determined by interpolation.
2. In the absence of a podium, the base price is determined in accordance with the area of the pedestal.
Table 4.4
Name of the monument | Natural indicator of the object | Base prices (thousand rubles) |
|
Sculptural composition with the number of composition elements (with relief elements), pcs.: | sculptural composition | ||
10 or more |
Note: within the boundaries of the indicated intervals of the elements of the composition, the value of the base price is determined by interpolation.
Table 4.5
Name of the monument | Natural indicator of the object | Base prices (thousand rubles) |
|
Memorial number of composition elements (with relief elements), pcs.: | sculptural composition | ||
12 or more |
Note: within the boundaries of the indicated intervals of the elements of the composition, the value of the base price is determined by interpolation.
4.2. The cost of the main design works for the reconstruction of monuments is calculated taking into account the coefficients given in Table 4.6 for those sections of the project that relate to reconstruction.
Table 4.6
Name of the monument | Coefficient value |
|
Sculpture | ||
sculptural composition | ||
Memorial |
4.3. When designing monuments in difficult conditions of inclusion in the environment, the cost of the main design work is determined taking into account the coefficients given in Table 4.7 of this Collection.
Table 4.7
Factors affecting the complexity of the design, and the values of the coefficients that take into account the complex conditions for the inclusion of an object in the environment
Factors affecting the complexity of design | Coefficient values |
|
An object on the territory of a zone of protection of a cultural heritage object or a historical zone (on the territory or in close proximity to historical and cultural monuments, except for the zone of a protected natural landscape) | ||
An object on the territory of a protected natural landscape zone (landscape ensembles, parks, gardens, protected areas, squares, territories of natural complexes, etc.) | ||
Crowded area (in accordance with the design assignment); the presence of nearby existing buildings and a dense network of underground utilities that require additional measures to create conditions for the location of the facility; on terrain with slopes greater than 30 ppm | ||
The presence of a stressful mode of urban transport (ground and underground) in the immediate vicinity of the designed facility, requiring additional measures to reduce vibration, etc. |
Note: the coefficients for items 1-2 of the table are applied to the cost of designing monuments for the following sections: master plan, architectural solutions, landscaping and construction site. Simultaneous application of coefficients is not allowed.
Application
Example 1
The project for the installation of a monument to P.P. Melnikov with the improvement of the adjacent territory.
This type of monument is regarded as a sculpture, referred to the II category of complexity. The monument is located in the historical zone. Monument area - 100 m
The base cost of design work with the improvement of the adjacent territory is determined in accordance with formula (3.1):
459.0 x 1.0 x (0.565 x 1.3 + 0.37 + 0.065) =
= 536.80 thousand rubles,
where
\u003d 459.0 - base price of the main design work (determined according to table 4.3);
0.370 - share of the cost of developing design solutions (table 3.2);
MPP-1.1-16" and is
536.80 x 3.533 \u003d 1,896.51 thousand rubles,
).
Example 2
The project of installing a monument to the residents of the Central Administrative District - participants in the Second World War with the improvement of the adjacent territory.
This type of monument is regarded as a sculptural composition consisting of 4 elements, referred to the II category of complexity.
The monument is located in the historical zone.
The base cost of design work with the improvement of the adjacent territory is determined in accordance with formula 3.1.
677.0 x 1.0 x (0.565 x 1.3 + 0.37 + 0.065) =
= 791.75 thousand rubles,
where
\u003d 677.0 - base price of the main design work (determined according to table 4.4);
=1.0 - coefficient taking into account the type of documentation being developed (determined according to table 1.1);
0.565 - share of the cost of developing an architectural and planning solution: general plan (10.5%), architectural solution (25.5%); share of the cost of landscaping the adjacent territory (16.5%), PIC (4.0%) according to table 3.2;
0.370 - share of the cost of developing design solutions table (3.2);
0.065 - share of the cost of the estimate documentation (table 3.2);
K=1.3 - the object is located in the historical zone (point 1 of Table 4.7 and note to Table 4.7).
The design cost at current prices is determined by the formula (4.1) of the "General Guidelines for the Application of the Moscow Regional Recommendations. MRR-1.1-16" and is
791.75 x 3.533 = 2797.25 thousand rubles,
where \u003d 3.533 is the conversion factor (inflationary change) of the base cost of design work in the current price level of the IV quarter of 2016 to the prices of 2000 (according to the order of Moscomexpertiza dated 01.21.2016 N MKE-OD / 16-1).
Electronic text of the document
prepared by Kodeks JSC and verified against:
Moscomexpertiza official website
www.mke.mos.ru (scanner-copy)
as of 01/17/2017
