We bought an apartment under the PrEP, from an affiliated legal entity. the builder's faces, but in fact they are the same persons, just a formally different legal entity. face. The office is shared and the employees are the same.
The company seems to be divided into good and bad employees. Employees who work directly with customers try to do everything for customers, or they pretend to be very good at it. When questions arise and you contact the departments by phone, you get absolutely mirror image! Boorish and impudent questions / answers, attempts to make the client look like an idiot and a harsh tone of communication just kills! I just want to come to the office, listen to how they will communicate live. If we talk about the specifics, then we encountered various kinds of problems. We had an apartment with finishing from the developer, but getting inside the apartment is unrealistic, only after stable calls to the office for almost a month, they gave fruit, and got into the apartment to see how it looks live. On acceptance contacted the specialist. apartment reception company, so that an experienced eye would point out possible shortcomings that we do not know about. Actually, as for the finishing of the claims, at least, there were few identified shortcomings, and none of them were serious. But here the area diverged by 0.8 meters, not in our favor. Immediately on the day of the inspection, claims were written and left in the Criminal Code for their elimination. But the most interesting thing is that the seller insists that all acceptance documents be signed first, and only then they go to the inspection and receive the keys to the Criminal Code. When we heard this, we were very surprised. After some butting, they agreed to let us in for an inspection first. But since deficiencies were identified, we decided to wait for their elimination, and only then sign everything. And then the fun began, everything was fixed quickly, except for the windows. They asked to be replaced. because there were severe scratches. And we have been waiting for a replacement for a month! The employees of the Criminal Code, whose contacts were given, were fed only with promises, and when they began to run out of time for preliminary agreement, and writing a claim on the face of the seller, and not the Criminal Code, some movement began ...
Our claim about the discrepancy between the area and changing it to the real one was ignored, even the measurements from the cadastral engineer (they hired them themselves) were not weighty evidence for them. The answer was\"We do not have such a practice, according to our data, the area is the one that is in the contract\". As a result, they spat, and signed the contract.
Another of the\"terms \" of the seller was the personal registration of ownership, for which they, of course, wanted a financial reward. But this action decided to do it themselves, and got another spoke in the wheel. On their part, the documents were never submitted (we filed on time), and when, after the Nth number of calls, we got through to the appropriate department, we received an answer that they had not filed anything and were not going to, also in a boorish tone!
Outcome.
- There are few complaints about the quality of work.
- Customer focus should not be expected to be good. The exception is sales managers in the sales office and secretary girls in the main office. The rest are by mood.
- When trying to deprive a free income, they put spokes in the wheels, delaying the registration process.
Disturbing news: one of the largest developers in the country, FGC "Leader", may be on the verge of ruin. There is new information.
The company refutes the conclusions of the journalistic investigation, but cannot give exhaustive answers to a number of questions. Instead, a message is being circulated about the launch of a new “mega-project”, the shareholders of which, as one might assume, will ensure the completion of the old houses. Among other things, a fact was revealed: the audit of the holding is being carried out by the Professional Group of Evaluation, which is led by Anna Isaeva, the wife of one of the main operators of the proposed scheme for withdrawing funds from the holding.
A number of mass media have recently announced internal problems of FGC "Leader". Journalists tried to understand what circumstances lie behind the delay in the delivery of houses in two housing complexes (Domodedovo Park and First Andreevsky) and stumbled upon a whole tangle of suspicious connections and financial obligations, which, perhaps, lead the company "Leader" to collapse. According to published information, the developer's assets are being withdrawn through nominees and affiliated companies, and the developer's management has already prepared for emigration to Malta.
FGC "Leader" is not an ordinary construction company, but one of the largest construction firms Russia. It is led by Vladimir Voronin and his sister Irina Voronina, the children of an entrepreneur and former official Alexander Voronin, who created his business with the support of the Luzhkov administration.
Vladimir Voronin
At present, according to a number of media reports, the assets of FGC Leader are pledged, it has no property and money: Vladimir Voronin's share is pledged by SoyuzAgro, and Irina Voronina's assets are pledged by LLC Balashikha-City. Both transactions were formalized by a certain notary Kirill Sidorov, and both employ people (6 people in total) who “part-time” work in the “Leader” itself. In turn, Balashikha-City and SoyuzAgro belong to to an individual(more on that below) and offshore companies. It turns out that the assets of FGC Leader are no longer in Russia. By the way, among the owners of these offshore companies are the employees of the developer.
To "SoyuzAgro" and "Balashikha City" is added almost two dozen more offices, Russian and foreign, affiliated and connected by non-transparent ties with FGC "Leader". According to the developer himself, Leader is currently building 14 multi-apartment residential complexes for several tens of thousands of people in the capital and the Moscow region. Eight more LCDs are being built in other cities of the country, three of which are in St. Petersburg.
One of the grounds to suspect the management of FGC was the message from RBC about the acquisition of foreign passports by the Voronin family under the program "citizenship of Malta for investment." The structure of the Voronins' business is all the more suspicious and is a network of affiliated companies with a "live wallet" in the person of a certain Yuri Isaev (mentioned above as a co-owner of FGC assets in partnership with offshore companies), who worked with the Voronins on a number of projects, and now - the founder, according to various sources, about 15 companies and 8 directors. Isaev himself, apparently, is deprived of any real business independence. Despite the official income of 8.5 million rubles, he does not even have his own bank account.
Millionaire Yuri Isaev
The journalists compared the business schemes in Lider with the state of affairs in the recently collapsed construction giant Urban Group. It turned out to be very similar: on the eve of its fall, the finances of the Urban Group leaked through subsidiaries and affiliated structures. The Urban company is a long-time partner of the Leader company, and, as Vladimir Voronin recently stated, it even owed the Leader about 40 million rubles. Quite a legitimate question: was the Voronins' network of affiliated firms used to withdraw funds from the Urban Group?
Finally, the "Leader" found two strange pledges. The first one is in Sberbank for 302 objects in the form of apartments and parking spaces. Journalists are perplexed: didn’t “Leader” illegally pawn the already sold real estate in those very problematic residential complexes “Domodedovo Park” and “First Andreevsky”? The second is 34 promissory notes of a certain Malab-invest LLC in the amount of about 3 billion rubles in VTB. The Malab company is also managed by an employee of FGC Leader, and the offshore Malab Enterprises limited, associated with the assets of the late businessman Dmitry Bliznyuk, who died in the summer of 2013 under suspicious circumstances, is listed as a shadow partner. Most of Bliznyuk's money "sailed" through nominees, and his numerous heirs, partners and creditors are still suing to this day. How such a dubious asset got to the Voronins is another mystery.
Reports about the dubious quality of FGC's work against the background of these news look insignificant.
After the publication of the investigation, the developer posted a rebuttal response on its official website, which states that FGC "Leader" is building projects mainly at its own expense and the funds of the participants shared construction, and the only loan in the amount of 2.7 billion rubles was taken for the implementation of the Moscow project of the Breathing premium-class house. This house has already been built and delivered. At the same time, about the recent purchase of DSK-1, on which a loan of 12 billion rubles “hung”, and mall“Marie” in Moscow (a loan of 6 billion rubles) was kept silent by the PR service of the “Leader”.
As IA Regnum notes, the company's response does not say anything about information about the possible withdrawal of funds from Urban Group through FGC structures. RBC's information about the Voronins' Maltese passports was also left without clarification. The FLB publication also adds that the developer's refutation also failed to answer the question why the property, assets and shares of the shareholders of FGC Leader were pledged to third-party companies, and these companies themselves belong to offshore companies.
In general, Vladimir Voronin’s quotes in the “refutation” and comments for Vedomosti make one wonder: how immersed is he in financial processes within your company? For example, on the holding's website it is directly indicated that the objects are being evaluated by a certain LLC "Professional Assessment Group". The managing partner of this organization is Anna Isaeva, the wife of the already mentioned Yuri Isaev, whom the media considers the “zits-chairman” and the holder of FSK assets that have not yet been withdrawn from Russia. How is this possible? It would be strange to assume that in one of the largest construction companies engage in fraud so without regard to the possibility of even the most superficial verification? But the activities of the developer, as reported by the media, are already interested in law enforcement agencies. Or, even more bizarrely, does management simply not know what's going on?
Information about the problems of FGC did not go unnoticed in the expert community. For example, the telegram channel “Ministry of Truth”, which specializes in exposing fakes, writes that “the media activities of FGC Leader are alarming in itself and without “refutations”, and today the media reported, with reference to FGC, that the company starts building a large residential complex"Danish Quarter" in Mytishchi. “Against the background of “unfinished construction” in the residential complex “First Andreevsky”, “Domodedovo Park” and “Emerald Valley”, the launch of a new project
looks like an attempt to raise funds for the completion of old facilities,” writes the “Ministry of Truth”. Information about the desire of FGC Leader to complete the construction of Urban Group facilities against the background of rumors about the joint fraud of these offices also looks strange. Probably, the scandal will develop further.
Some documents from the investigation materials:
Schemes inside the "FSK "Leader" with the participation of Yuri Isaev and other alleged "dummy":
Ownership structure of firms – pledge holders of FGC Leader:
Details about offshore owners in the FGC Leader scheme:
FGC "Leader" is an actively growing company, one of the top 10 developers in Russia. Today, the company's portfolio of projects in Moscow, the Moscow region, the Southern Federal District and other regions includes about 4 million square meters. m of housing, in 2015 it put into operation more than half a million square meters. m of real estate. In September 2016, the developer FSK "Leader" received control over DSK-1, a large Moscow developer with production facilities 1.2 million sq. housing per year.
In Moscow and the Moscow Region, FGC "Leader" operates mainly in the "comfort" segment and offers customers the concept of UP-blocks: these are large microdistricts of monolithic housing in successful locations, with modern author's architecture, a non-linear arrangement of houses in a territory saturated with infrastructure, including underground parking . The developer cooperates with well-known design bureaus, uses up-to-date materials and engineering solutions. However, in many of the company's projects, the postponement of the commissioning of houses was fixed.
