First of all, pay attention to the space to the right of the "Find" button. If the inscription “A general meeting of homeowners was held in the house” appeared there, then the information presented below is for informational purposes only. Such houses are marked with an asterisk (*) on the map. According to the rules for voting on the draft renovation program, enshrined in Decree of the Government of Moscow No. 245-PP, the decision made at the general meeting is a priority.
If the inscription does not appear, then general meeting was not, voting took place in the Active Citizen system and in the My Documents public service centers.
The first line is the voting results themselves. They indicate the percentage of apartments that voted for the inclusion of the house in the draft renovation program and against it. In addition, next to these two numbers, the inscription “Votes not taken into account (the opinions of the apartment owners were divided equally)” and information about how many such apartments may appear. According to the Decree of the Government of Moscow No. 245-PP,. If the inscription did not appear, then in your house all the apartments were able to make a consolidated decision.
Following this, the details of the voting process in the house are specified. All personal data, the publication of which is prohibited by the 152nd federal law, is represented by identifiers that are available only to the voting participants themselves. They were sent via SMS or e-mail after accounting for the vote in the Active Citizen or My Documents public service centers.
Opposite the vote identifier, the decision made by the owner or tenant of the apartment and the date when it was recorded are indicated. In the far right column, the choice of an apartment is reported - for or against. According to the Decree of the Government of Moscow No. 245-PP, if an apartment has two or more owners or tenants, then the voting results for this apartment are determined by a simple majority of votes.
If there are apartments in the house, the opinions of owners or tenants in which are divided, the “Opinion is not determined” block will be available, where, according to the same principles, the results of their voting will be published.
The capital's mayor's office announced changes in the system for taking into account the opinions of residents of five-story buildings, who must decide on the demolition of their houses by June 15. Silent people who did not participate in this procedure will not be included in the number of renovation supporters, as previously assumed. The public headquarters of the mayor's office for monitoring the renovation reported that almost half of the residents of the five-story buildings had already voted.
The fact that the "silent" in five-story buildings will not be able to influence the results of the vote on the renovation program, said the capital's mayor Sergei Sobyanin. Recall that the city authorities have compiled a preliminary list for demolition of 4.5 thousand houses; from May 15 to June 15, residents are surveyed at the MFC and the Active Citizen project or at a general meeting of homeowners. The decision to include a house in the renovation program is made by a two-thirds vote; the townspeople - "silent" at the same time were going to be considered as having voted for. “In principle, this is correct,” Mr. Sobyanin noted, explaining that similar norms about “silent people” are written in pension legislation and the law on overhaul. However, the mayor made a reservation that with this approach it is difficult to count votes in houses with a low turnout - for example, at the level of 30%, and even in cases where the opinion of active residents on the demolition of the house was distributed equally. “Dumping into one basket” the votes of the “silent ones” the mayor “does not raise his hand”: “Therefore, having once again consulted with the experts, we will change the voting procedure.” In particular, now the votes of the “silent ones” “will be taken into account in proportion to the votes of other residents” who voted both for and against the demolition of the house.
We are talking about the actual ignoring of the "silent". The mayor's office explained that in the example of Sergei Sobyanin about 30% of the residents who voted equally (15% of the poll participants for and the same number against), a decision will be made not to demolish this house. According to the previous rules, at the expense of 70% of the silent people, the building would have been included in the renovation program.
The opinion of officials on the issue of "silent people" has consistently changed. So, on May 2, simultaneously with the release of the Moscow government decree “on taking into account the opinion of the population on the renovation project,” the mayor’s office explained that the residents of five-story buildings who ignored the survey would definitely be recognized as supporters of renovation. However, on May 19, Sergei Sobyanin made it clear that with a low turnout and 70-80% of the "silent" in the house of power, they might decide to demolish it "in the second, third, tenth turn." “There is no need to sit back,” the mayor urged. Approximately the same Mr. Sobyanin said now, explaining that the "silent" have another two weeks before the end of the survey.
Political scientist Mikhail Vinogradov calls the original "silent" vote counting scheme "one of the most scandalous initiatives," explaining that the authorities are now trying to remove "the toughest of these allergens." Mr. Vinogradov considers the current initiative of the mayor's office successful, but recalls other claims of the opponents of the renovation - for example, about the "lack of voting transparency." The expert admits that critics of the renovation are “losing more and more rational arguments”, but says that “the citizens will have a feeling that many initiatives were originally put forward for a subsequent exchange.” “Even after the signing of a compromise, officials continue to assist the renovation, talking about the “Caucasian” voting results on it,” Mr. Vinogradov explains.
The public headquarters of the mayor's office for monitoring renovation reported that residents of 47.5% of apartments in five-story buildings have already voted, while in 4.1 thousand houses two-thirds support demolition, and only 67 houses have refused to participate in the program by two-thirds of the votes. Meanwhile, according to Kommersant's information, conflicts between neighbors - supporters and opponents of the demolition - have already taken place in a number of areas. So, on Monday, during a meeting of residents of one of the houses in the Metrogorodok district, renovation supporters attacked an activist from an initiative group opposed to the demolition and smashed her video camera. The situation called for the police to be called.
Alexander Voronov
According to them, 20% of residents of houses included in the preliminary list of the renovation program used the right to vote on the demolition on the Active Citizen portal, in the My Documents public service centers or during general meetings of residents. According to Marat Khusnullin, Deputy Mayor of Moscow for Urban Policy and Construction, about 90% of those who voted were in favor of the renovation.
At the same time, these data are very different from the reaction of Muscovites in social networks, where the vector of attitude to what is happening around five-story buildings in some cases has the opposite direction.
The largest number The very idea of voting, reflected in the Decree of the Government of Moscow No. 245-PP of May 02, 2017, under the loud title “On taking into account the opinion of the population on the project of renovation of the housing stock in the city of Moscow”, raises questions. According to the plan of the city authorities, it is on the basis of its results that a decision will be made on the demolition of one or another house, previously included in the renovation program.
Already at the first reading the status this document concerning the personal property of hundreds of thousands of Muscovites raises a number of legal questions. Reedus tried to figure out what the Moscow authorities are actually offering to the residents of five-story buildings.
It must be admitted that this wonderful document, designed to explain to the residents of five-story buildings why and how they should take part in voting on the renovation of the housing stock, on the contrary, only adds more and more questions. The first and most important of them is what Muscovites are generally invited to vote for:
1.1. Voting order for subsequent inclusion apartment buildings into the draft program for the renovation of the housing stock in the city of Moscow (hereinafter referred to as the Procedure) determines the voting rules for the subsequent inclusion in the draft program for the renovation of the housing stock in the city of Moscow of apartment buildings included in the list of apartment buildings proposed for voting for the subsequent inclusion of apartment buildings in the draft renovation program housing stock in the city of Moscow (hereinafter referred to as the list), and also determines the rules for summing up the results of this voting.
So, quite ornately, the document indicates its main goal. Translated from bureaucratic into Russian, this means that residents are invited to vote for inclusion or non-inclusion in a certain project of a certain programtheir houses,already selected for renovation.
Let's leave aside the fact that the very term "renovation", which implies renewal and modernization, is used in this case extremely incorrectly and only masks completely different actions in relation to the selected houses. Much more interesting is that no renovation program, designed in the form of an appropriate federal law, currently does not exist. The law is in the adoption stage, and the second reading on it will take place only in early July, while the vote, according to the plan of the Moscow authorities, should be completed on June 15. From which the conclusion suggests itself that the inhabitants of five-story buildings, whose houses were in some kind of not entirely clear list, vote only for someone's ideas, assumptions, and sometimes not the most modest "Wishlist".
The method of voting also raises no less questions, namely the Active Citizen portal, which is essentially a simple Internet application for conducting polls that is not endowed with any legal functionality. Whether such a platform is suitable for voting related to issues of personal property of citizens is a big question.
The third format raises the least questions - voting during general meetings of residents. However, in accordance with the ruling, it is considered only as a possible option.
The main criterion for deciding for or against demolition and resettlement is also completely incomprehensible:
6.10. An apartment building is considered supported for inclusion in the draft housing renovation program in the city of Moscow if the number of apartments that voted “for inclusion” of the apartment building in the draft housing renovation program ... exceeds 2/3 of the total number of apartments in such apartment building…
The first and only question related to this is why exactly 2/3 of the tenants should decide the fate of the house, and not 4/5 or 1/3, despite the fact that, according to the current Housing Code, such decisions are made only with 100% consent of homeowners?
“All the polls they want to do are absolutely illegitimate and unconstitutional. Even if 99.9% of your house decides that it is playing something, you have the right to property, ”Dmitry Potapenko, a member of the Presidium of the General Council of the Growth Party, commented on the legality of the voting the other day.
According to him, any vote, whether on Active Citizen or elsewhere, has no basis, because in Russian legislation so far there are only three possibilities for deprivation of property - an exchange agreement, a sale and purchase agreement and a court decision. And renovation does not fall into any of these categories.
Timur Marshani, a lawyer and a member of the Moscow Bar Association, shares a similar opinion.
The use of the Active Citizen system (as well as any other similar system) to determine the real will of citizens on a particular issue is absolutely incompetent, the lawyer explained to Reedus. - These systems do not exist for binding voting, and certainly not for decision-making by the authorities.
The real surprise and indignation, both among specialists and ordinary apartment owners, is caused by another truly brilliant paragraph of the document:
6.5. If all owners of an apartment (a part of an apartment) and (or) tenants under a social tenancy agreement did not take part in the voting, their apartment is taken into account in summarizing the voting results as an apartment that voted “for inclusion” of an apartment building in the draft housing renovation program in the city Moscow, - says the "Procedure of voting".
On what basis citizens who are absent or unable to vote are considered to have voted in favor cannot be explained at all.
The ambiguous formula “silence is a sign of consent”, adopted by the Moscow authorities, in which a person who did not take part in the vote is automatically ranked among the supporters of the demolition, does not climb into any gates, - Timur Marshani laments. Since when are those who abstained from voting considered to have voted in favour? Where is this generally practiced?
The conclusion from the situation around the voting on the program for the demolition and resettlement of Moscow five-story buildings is simple and sad: what is happening today can be called a substitution of the concepts of a non-committal poll of the population and a referendum, which the current poll is clearly not.
According to Marshani, this is just a consultative sociological survey, the results of which do not and cannot have any force. The authorities may take into account the results of such surveys, but there is no law that would give them the right to refer to the results of opinion polls as a basis for certain actions.
The opinion of this or that group of people, regardless of its size, is not binding, because then it would not be called democracy (electronic or whatever), but ochlocracy - the power of the mob, says the lawyer. - For decision-making, there are procedures prescribed in the laws, and not a single law of the Russian Federation or the city of Moscow mentions voting on the mayor's office website as a source of legislative initiative, let alone executive action.
Only a targeted survey, conducted by name, with the passport data of each participant, can have legal force, Timur Marshani believes. And not for the city as a whole, but for each specific house. Voting en masse, spread over the city, does not provide such an opportunity and is therefore doubly unlawful.
The renovation program taking place in the capital remains a fairly powerful factor that has an impact on the real estate market as a whole - both on the primary real estate segment and on the state of the secondary housing market.
In this article, we will talk about what changes the renovation caused in the market during 2017-2019 and what market participants have to prepare for in the near and long term.
The portal site asked experts who are direct market players to comment on the situation and give a professional assessment of the degree and quality of the impact of the renovation program on the housing market in the Moscow region.
First of all, it should be noted that the impact of renovation does not affect the entire market in terms of whether real estate objects belong to housing of different classes. Renovation has a very limited impact on the comfort class housing market, does not affect the business real estate market in any way, and even more so, does not affect the elite housing segment. Mainly, the implementation of the program is reflected in the segment of "standard" class housing. (this class was previously called "economy"). Housing in this category occupies the most significant share of the entire residential real estate market, as it is the most affordable.
The launch of the renovation program took place in parallel with the introduction of new laws that tighten the rules of the game in the market shared construction and thus further aggravated the situation of developers, already complicated by the negative trends that could be observed in the economy at that time, which led to a significant decrease in demand. In addition to additional legislative restrictions, developers have a new competitor in the face of the state itself, which is the initiator of the resettlement of people from dilapidated houses.
Considering the scale of the program, as well as the quality of competition (with state participation, the cost of real estate is lower, and the level of financial support is significantly higher) operators operating in the segment of the most affordable housing will become less competitive. They will not be able to lower prices to increase the competitive advantage of the properties they offer, as the level of demand now leaves much to be desired (although this may change in the future).
However, developers and builders will feel this competition not immediately, but after three to five years. Now only the first wave of immigrants has begun, and only a very small part of the "renovation" apartments will be on the market - real estate will be sold by those who successfully seized the moment and instead of an apartment in a dilapidated building got a completely new housing.
In fact, such an exchange is excellent opportunity for all migrants: you can get a small mortgage, sell an apartment and move to a more spacious (or better) housing.
Some companies are likely to leave the market under the pressure of a lack of sufficient demand, as well as measures related to the transition from equity construction to project finance. There will be mainly large companies that are able to independently finance the construction of their own facilities.
However, already now there were companies that saw new opportunities in the circumstances. Given the desire of officials who are involved in the implementation of the program and its promotion, to optimize construction costs as much as possible, the lower threshold for the quality of real estate is limited only by existing standards. This fact does not mean that housing is bad, however, buyers and migrants do not have to rely on comfortable layouts and the use of any innovative materials that guarantee an additional increase in performance.
Private companies, in turn, began to offer housing of the same class, but with certain improvements, although requiring some expenses, but increasing the comfort of living in apartments. First of all, of course, we are talking about layouts, systems of mutual arrangement of buildings in residential complexes, and the availability of convenient parking spaces.
It is quite natural that such housing is preferred by those whose budget did not allow them to purchase an apartment in a “comfort” class building, and who wished to receive housing of a higher quality than the required minimum, and, most likely, this trend will continue in over the coming years.
Lowering mortgage rates also played into the hands of developers– last year, 2017, a new record was set in mortgage lending, we can observe this trend at the moment. By the way, this circumstance had no effect on the facilities being built as part of the renovation program, since in this case there are slightly different methods of financing that differ from the conditions for shared construction.
At the moment, the authorities, in fact, do not allow developers to finance and participate in the renovation project. However, this situation is likely to change soon:
Firstly, the officials themselves declared the need to attract all willing market participants (However, in reality, the opposite is true),
Secondly, the city itself cannot finance the project in full. This requires a huge investment, which is simply nowhere to take, given the long-term payback. Thus, some developers will be able to stay afloat thanks to the state project.
After the signing by the President of amendments to the law on the capital status (thus the renovation program was approved) announced a vote to determine the wishes of the townspeople. According to the results of voting in the program - about 5 thousand buildings, most of which are "Khrushchev" (in five floors). Actually, this is almost 70% of the total housing stock of this type available in Moscow.
INTERESTING FACT:
To implement the program, it was necessary to vote among the residents of the capital, since this program relates to them in the most direct way.
Residents of 276 five-story buildings refused to be demolished- the owners of more than a third of all apartments in each of these houses were against participation in the program. Interests were divided in 184 houses - tenants from 40 to 60% of apartments voted for participation in the program. Consequently, these houses are also deprived of the opportunity to participate in the renovation program.
A website has been created for the convenience of finding information. (consisting, however, of a single page), where everyone can find out the results for their home:
But the resettlement schedule is not yet ready, it will appear only before the end of 2019, and then all participants will know at the same time when it will be possible to move.
The Moscow authorities announced a competition among architects, and received 132 applications. Specialists from 17 countries took part in this competition, moreover, 40 proposals were received from foreign teams. The winners will be involved in the creation of pilot projects and concepts within the framework of this program.
Qualitative parameters determined finishing works: it will be an improved finish that does not require any additional work. Actually, along with the quality, the cost of finishing was also determined, the total price of work and materials will slightly exceed 11 thousand rubles. per square. By the way, the cost of traditional decoration (municipal style) is a little over 7 thousand rubles. per square.
A resolution was adopted regarding the basic requirements for landscaping works related to residential development carried out under the renovation program. Among other things, the document states that the requirements for improvement according to the wishes of the residents can be changed.
Regarding parking areas, the following decision was made: in the new quarters, one parking space, on average, for 2.5 apartments, in previously built-up areas this figure is one parking space for about 3.5-7 apartments.
The Moscow Mayor's Office has established the procedure for buying apartments, as well as the cost of housing for program participants who need to expand their housing. The first 80 apartments have already been presented, completely ready for purchase for an extra charge - the objects are located in the Izmailovo district.
By the way, you can buy housing for a surcharge, the area of \u200b\u200bwhich is not more than 100 square meters. meters
The approved procedure also provides, among other things, for the provision of discounts when purchasing additional space - program participants are guaranteed a 10% discount.
A list of buildings that will not be demolished as part of the renovation program has been approved, the list includes 218 objects- these are buildings and complexes, without which it is difficult to imagine the appearance of Moscow. The objects represent town-planning, as well as historical and architectural value.
By the end of this year, the Moscow authorities are going to complete the construction and commissioning of houses so far only in eight districts of the capital. The Construction Department reports that 33 houses have been commissioned for migrants in different parts of Moscow.
To date, the city authorities have also approved 242 launch sites where construction will take place.
By the way, today the number of houses included in the program is 5171 houses.
Today, the Renovation Fund is creating 90 projects of houses according to the standard of the program, by the end of September this year it plans to announce tenders to determine the contractor. More than 230 sites are in the active phase of construction, a little more than 400 are under development. A fairly large-scale construction will begin, every district of Moscow will be covered.
The Mayor reported to the President that 10,000 residents will be relocated to new houses by the end of the year, it is planned to transfer 32 objects, of which 9 have already been transferred. Thus, it will be possible to relocate the inhabitants of 43 five-story buildings.
Moscow region developers also felt the pressure of renovation - the presence of a huge number of housing offers in the capital (which in itself causes a reduction in cost), along with the availability of mortgages, determines a certain change in the orientation of potential customers, who, for obvious reasons, prefer living in Moscow. Thus, in 2015, the Moscow region accounted for about 83% of transactions from the total volume(Moscow and MO) , now this figure is 57%.
So, readers are probably interested to know what forecasts will be made by developers and developers. Potential buyers need to understand in which direction the market is moving, what will happen to prices, how (and will it change) real estate quality.
Word to the experts...
Alexander Krasavin
First Deputy Chairman of the Board of Barkley Corporation
More than 30% of new housing (more than 1 million sq. m) built during the renovation will be exhibited on open market. Therefore, the renovation program will affect the real estate market, but not immediately - the effect will be noticeable in three to four years, as this housing is withdrawn and its market share increases.
The renovation will affect only the comfort class, as it will work in this segment. If, in addition to everything, there is no cheaper supply on the secondary housing in connection with the change in Federal Law 214, then the entire volume of supply will be at the same price level - and the secondary housing, and renovation, and primary housing. Everyone will be in the same competitive zone. Against this backdrop, a product quality struggle could begin, and if the renovation program can offer quality, interesting homes, then it will have a significant impact on the market. To win in this competition, developers will have to work very hard on the product - it must be some kind of unique solutions that the city does not offer, verified layouts, special finishing materials, unusual architecture. In fact, Barkley has long been focusing on architectural and technological advantages residential complexes, that's our speciality. We are building housing that is higher than the average parameters of its segment in terms of level, including in terms of comfort - and by sales in the Honey Valley, one can judge that our product is interesting and in demand. And in the future, especially taking into account renovation, developers will have to, while remaining within the same prices, create a competitive offer precisely due to the parameters of housing. This process can lead to the fact that private companies that have not been able to withstand such a struggle will be forced out of the market.
Andrey Kolochinsky
Managing Partner, VectorStroyFinance
Less than a year has passed since the approval of the renovation program. To date, there are already ready-made new buildings, where people are being resettled from a dilapidated housing stock. However, it is still too early to assess the impact of the program on the capital's real estate market, since the main volume of square meters intended for sale will enter the market in a few years.
According to Sberbank CIB analysts, in order to recoup the costs of the renovation program, the city will have to sell a total of 21.9 million square meters. m, that is, 1.5 million square meters. m per year. This is a fairly large figure - about half of the current volume of supply. However, according to representatives of the Moscow Construction Complex, about half of the housing built according to renovation, that is, about 15 million square meters, will go on sale. If we stretch this volume over the entire period of the program, we will get a not so big figure.
In any case, the new volume of supply in the primary market may complicate the position of the capital's developers. I hope that square meters within the framework of the renovation program will be sold at market prices and the city will not dump, so as not to bring down the market. Although today the first settlers wishing to purchase additional meters are given a 10% discount.
Developers will have a hard time, they will be forced to adapt to changes, optimize costs, differentiate the offer and at the same time offer a higher quality product compared to typical urban projects. At the same time, the city will have an undeniable competitive advantage– location of projects, because most sites for renovation are located in populated areas with good transport accessibility and developed infrastructure.
Yana Glazunova
CEO of VSN Realty
After the start of the program, the sellers of "Khrushchev" raised prices, positioning such a purchase as a long-term investment. Many owners of dilapidated real estate, in the hope of getting better and more modern housing, have completely changed their minds about selling it. The number of offers for the sale of apartments in buildings that have fallen under renovation has decreased by 15-20%.
In the Moscow region, the renovation program is insignificant, but restrains the growth of the cost square meter in new buildings.
Natalia Kuznetsova
General Director of the real estate agency "Bon Ton"
Plans to replace obsolete housing with new homes are being implemented step by step. The impact of renovation cannot yet be called sufficiently tangible for new buildings in the capital, but it is also true that the program is only gaining momentum. Thus, it is still too early to assess its impact on the industry.
It should be noted that the very fact of the launch of the program, which became a resonant event for the market, was perceived by developers with some concerns. The reasons for this are the advantageous position of the city, associated with the presence of an administrative resource, and really colossal plans for the scale of development. Official reports reported that more than two hundred sites with the construction of 3.58 million m2 were selected for the implementation of the program.
So far, a more tangible impact has been recorded in the secondary housing segment. This applies to both the cost and the volume of supply in houses that have fallen under renovation. The number of such apartments for sale has decreased markedly, as owners expect improvements living conditions at the expense of the state.
In the primary market, we observe the following picture - at the stage of considering the competitive environment, the developer takes into account the availability of launch sites for renovation, as well as vacated houses.
The construction of new houses in the neighborhood will increase competition, and residents of houses subject to renovation are not interested in buying an apartment in a new building. This in itself cuts off part of the demand.
OLGA BARABANOVA
Commercial Director of Sezar Group
It is too early to talk about the tangible results of the impact of renovation on the market, but the already announced inputs are enough to assess the prospects for the development of the segment of new buildings. Apartments that exceed the renovation needs will be commercialized. We are talking about a large number of apartments with characteristics that are attractive to the mass audience: location in “inhabited” areas, comfort class standards, with a high degree of probability at an attractive price - construction volumes and administrative resources can fundamentally reduce the cost. A logical conclusion follows from this: the share of business in the most budgetary segment of housing, if it remains, will be minimal. Professional development will be concentrated in segments from “comfort-plus class” and above, working for an audience for whom it is important to have not “standard” housing (even if it is based on “good” standards), but “the latest model that no one used” . Under the influence of high competition, the level of quality of projects will grow, prices will also follow the cost.
Alexey Nikolaevich Shepel
Owner of S.HOLDING CORPORATION, former head of the Department of Urban Development Programs in the Luzhkov government and adviser to Resin
The first houses have already been built, but renovation in Moscow has not yet begun. The system has not yet been created: legislation is being improved, the management structure is being developed, new planning projects for renovation quarters are being developed. Now there is an active search for starting spots, but the first competitions for designing houses on them have already passed. At present, the issues of building new houses are being actively worked out: the problem of the removal and disposal of construction waste, the construction of new engineering and electrical networks, as well as roads and social facilities are being solved. These are all just elements of a complex system in which there is the most important dimension - people and the new environment in which they will live. Main question- when? More than 50% of requests from Muscovites are related to the timing and stages of resettlement, and only then the townspeople ask - where? The city should, according to the experience of the Luzhkov renovation, make a targeted list of design, strictly tied to the new master plan city, construction and commissioning of facilities for the first five years of renovation, which will begin to be developed in 2019. Then manual control and spot construction will be replaced by a transparent system that effectively manages the renovation process in Moscow. Until this system is put into operation, the impact of renovation on the housing market is insignificant, price fluctuations in five-story buildings are subject to the emotions of sellers and buyers, street retail is waiting, the average apartment rental period has remained the same as before - 6-9 months. Developers do not correct their plans, on the contrary, they are in a hurry to obtain new building permits, which is due to amendments to the law on equity participation. Impact on the market should be expected no earlier than 2021.
Irina Pesic
Managing Director of the Brokerage Department "MIEL-Network of Real Estate Offices"
At the moment, the secondary housing market in Moscow has completely calmed down and is developing in a calm mode. Now there are practically no investment purchases for the purpose of subsequent relocation - and we noted such cases last fall. The owners of apartments in the demolished five-story buildings got some idea about the timing of the move (that is, they realized that the resettlement would take place, most likely not in the near future). Those who planned to sell an apartment in a five-story building even without news of renovation, are fulfilling their plans. The rest decided to wait for the move. The number of lots offered for sale in five-story buildings since February 2017, i.e. the start of renovation, decreased somewhat precisely because the owners decided to wait. Prices for five-story buildings are now moving approximately in line with the market, not showing a clear rise or fall.
It can be assumed that the large-scale construction of new houses for migrants will revive the information space and the situation around five-story buildings. But while such projects can be counted on the fingers of one hand. And they do not have a significant impact on the market for such apartments.
Irina Dobrokhotova
Chairman of the Board of Directors of BEST-Novostroy
Despite the fact that the "pilot" houses under the renovation program have already been occupied, it must be remembered that these buildings were built before the program was announced. The first houses, which are designed directly for the purpose of renovation of the housing stock, have just begun to be built this summer - we are talking about a launch pad in the Cherkizovsky market area.
Nevertheless, the renovation program already has an indirect effect on the market. So, for example, the owners of secondary housing in “demolished” houses that were included in the program were divided into several groups: those who decided to urgently sell such an apartment (this increased the volume of supply in five-story buildings and some 9-story buildings that were included in the program); those who decided to calmly wait for the move and rent an apartment until the move; as well as those who are satisfied with the prospect of exchanging an apartment in an old house for a new building and are waiting for relocation. Landlords also had to change their strategy somewhat: many who want to rent apartments for long term in the old fund, now indicate that the house is not going to be demolished in the coming years, so as not to scare off tenants.
Igor Vasilenko
The demolition program for the dilapidated high-rise buildings of the capital met with mixed reviews from the capital's residents. Therefore, the possibility of voting by homeowners in houses that have become contenders for dismantling has become a kind of panacea for the general active indignation. And, while the results of the vote on the renovation have not yet been determined, each resident of the demolished house has the opportunity to officially express their opinion and be heard.
The analysis of the age category of residents of houses-applicants showed that the majority of citizens are under the age of 40 years. Parents will vote for children, so they are not taken into account. 30% of the residents are pensioners. It is reported that the information center for voting on renovation has developed several ways to express its opinion:
To leave your vote on the site, you need to provide the personal data of the person who voted, as well as the identifying data of the dwelling. It is convenient that the site has multifunctional services that allow you not only to express your opinion, but also to get acquainted with preliminary statistics.
The first place in the prerogative of votes will be given to the results of the general meeting of citizens. All residents, including children and pensioners, will be able to take part, which is displayed in the general minutes of the meeting at home. If it is not possible to express your opinion in any other way, then it is worth initiating a collection at home before the counting of the results begins.
It is easier and faster to leave your opinion in the My Documents service, which is located in many areas of the city. The center's employees will tell you when this or that stage of voting will begin and end, they will help you find out what documents are needed and how many times it is possible for the same person to vote.
The state program clearly defined the list of those who have the right to vote. So, voting on the renovation program is available:
The preparatory stage lasted one month and ended on May 15 and consisted in drawing up a preliminary list of applicants for dismantling. Also, during this period, forms of expression of will were determined and additional services for voting, and it is also established that it will influence the formation of the final list of facilities for dismantling. Then, on May 15, the practical period began, which lasted one month.
Attention! The ability to leave votes in any of the forms ended on June 15 and all services are currently closed.
It's already the third day that the stage of processing votes is going on. The analysis of the received data will be extended until the beginning of July. This is due to the large number of voters. Also, it should be taken into account that the results of voting on renovation are formed based on the results coming from three different sources. Complicating the task is the ability to vote for or against the renovation of five-story buildings several times. In this case, only the vote that was left later will be taken into account.
Important! According to the city authorities, in order to make a positive decision on the participation of the house in the renovation program, it is necessary to receive more than 70% of the votes "for".
The interim voting results, which are still being counted, showed that almost 80% of all residents of the applicant houses took part in the survey. But, you need to understand that apartments, the owners of which did not leave their vote, will be counted as those that agree for renovation.
Results statistics for each individual apartment:
Information about the house as a whole.
Intermediate voting results, as well as final figures will be presented on the Internet, as well as in the MFC. The final list of five-story buildings can be viewed at the end of August. After that, it is planned to start the practical phase of the Program.
