We decided to make this task easier. Make up your own budget! To do this, download the most suitable template, calculate and put down the volume of planned work, indicate the complexity categories, and the estimate is ready!
These templates can be useful in the process of requesting quotations and when conducting tenders by both budgetary and commercial organizations.
AT last years a rather unsightly phenomenon is common, when potential contractors, in order to get a coveted object, drop the price bar to an unacceptable level. Then, after kickbacks and the division of advances, they recall with some surprise - after all, the work needs to be done! and are looking for subcontractors who are ready to do the impossible for meager money. Such strike-breaking does no honor to anyone and hurts the quality of the work performed.
To create templates estimates used:
1. DIRECTORY OF BASIC PRICES FOR ENGINEERING SURVEYS FOR CONSTRUCTION.
ENGINEERING AND GEODETIC SURVEYS
Approved and put into effect by the Decree of the Gosstroy of Russia No. 213 of December 23, 2003.
It quite adequately reflects the real costs in the production of topographic and geodetic works.
2. DIRECTORY OF BASIC PRICES FOR ENGINEERING SURVEYS FOR CONSTRUCTION.
ENGINEERING AND GEODETIC SURVEYS DURING THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES
RECOMMENDED by the Gosstroy of the Ministry of Regional Development of the Russian Federation by letter No. SK-1976/02 dated May 24, 2006.
Of course, finance is a delicate matter, and the calculations presented here are not the ultimate truth. However, if the price of a potential applicant differs noticeably (by 20-30 percent in any direction) from that recommended by us, there is a reason to delve into more detail and consult, let's say, with local architectural authorities. This will allow you to avoid unreasonable costs or save you from poor-quality order fulfillment. An exception may be the case when you do not need to obtain Permits for the production of works, the Conditional system of coordinates and heights will suit you, and on the basis of the topoplan created in this way, projects that require approvals and approvals in the prescribed manner will not be developed. Then you can safely drop the price by 2-3 times and look for a surveyor who is ready to do the left work for a bare salary in his spare time from his main job, not burdened by the need to purchase equipment and tools, rent an office and maintain accounting, technical and technical department, quality control department and pay taxes. It is quite possible that the quality of his work will be excellent and will satisfy your requirements.
The section will be updated. We are interested in the unification of pricing in the industry, and if professionals with their own opinion drop in here, write! We'll discuss and make adjustments.
SBC 2004 for engineering geodetic surveys , approved in 2004 by the Pricing Department of Gosstroy, is designed to determine the base price at the 2001 level. In connection with the fact that the indices of the Ministry of Construction are issued for the price level of 2000, the basic values from the CBC for engineering and geodetic surveys (2004) should be translated by the index 1.19, approved by the letter of the State Construction Committee No. NZ-4316/10 dated 16.07.2003. This handbook contains both basic and aggregated prices for the performance of engineering and geodetic surveys and auxiliary works, calculated on the basis of the cost of using modern technologies for conducting cameral and field work in the course of engineering surveys. Basic CBC prices for engineering and geodetic surveys (2004), overhead costs, planned savings, and social charges are taken into account. Taxes and fees levied on organizations performing engineering and geodetic works are also taken into account by the norms of the collection, with the exception of VAT. Field surveys include travel expenses paid to employees, in contrast to engineering and geodetic work carried out in office conditions.
To learn how to make estimates for the CBC for engineering and geodetic surveys, you need to understand the structure of the collection and the principle by which its tables are compiled. Thus, in most tables, the values are presented as a fraction, the numerator of which represents the cost of field work, and the denominator - office work. For example, for the 1st category of complexity, the cost of leveling the 1st class will be 143 rubles. for field and 134 rubles. – for cameral work per 1 double-stroke tripod. The base prices of the compilation do not take into account the costs of external and internal transport, the cost of which is calculated according to tables 4 and 5 of this compilation. To calculate the cost of transportation of engineering and geodetic personnel from the base to the work site, we will use Table 4, in which the cost of transportation varies based on the distance in kilometers and the total estimated cost field survey work. So, if the distance between the base or place of residence of the expedition and the site of field work is 35 km, and the estimated cost of the survey is calculated at the level of 240 thousand rubles. Then the cost of internal transport according to table 4 will be 18.75%, i.e. 240,000 x 0.1875 \u003d 45 thousand rubles. Expenses for external transport make it possible to compensate for the costs associated with the transportation of personnel and equipment from the place of permanent deployment of the company that performs survey and geodetic work to the base of the expedition. The structure of table 5, used to calculate the costs of external transport, has a slightly different structure in comparison with table 4. Comparing the transportation distance to the base in one direction and the estimated cost of field and office work, we get the percentage of transport costs in both directions.
Speaking about the coefficients that increase the final cost according to the estimate, we note the mountainous and high-mountainous terrain, which gives an increase from 1.1 to 1.25. If it is necessary to perform work at night, the cost of field surveys should also be increased by a factor of 1.35. In principle, the coefficients that increase the cost of the estimate are written in a couple of pages in the CBC collection for engineering and geodetic surveys. For example, there is a coefficient used when drawing up color plans for structures in paints - 1.1.
Prices for engineering and survey works are indicated at the price level of 2001 and are translated into the current quarter by the indexes of the Ministry of Construction. Naturally, costs at current prices do not need to be additional translation indexes. When drawing up estimates for the contract, in some cases, contingencies of 10% or more are provided.
To work with the CBC collection for engineering and geodetic surveys, you need to understand the classification of complexity categories for the conditions for performing engineering and geodetic work and the categories of terrain complexity. When evaluating work on the manufacture and installation of geodetic signs, there is also a classification of soils, based on which the cost varies according to the estimate. Chapter 2 of the collection lists the standards for observations of the deformation of buildings and structures. To determine the cost of leveling, reconnaissance, determining the slopes of towers and columns, transferring heights from the horizon, etc., it is necessary to determine the category of complexity of engineering and geodetic surveys. The 1st category of complexity includes leveling on the streets of settlements with a building density of up to 20%, the 2nd category - 20-50% and the 3rd category - a building density of more than 50%. Thus, determining the cost of leveling of the 1st class in the estimate, we obtain that in the built-up part of the city the cost of field work will be 241 rubles, cameral - 195 rubles.
In the second part of the CBC collection for engineering and geodetic surveys, the basic prices for geodetic work on the ground are calculated, incl. breakdown of routes, removal of the axes of buildings, structures, structures. The third part of the collection of the same name contains prices for measuring work for calculating the geometric volumes of buildings and structures, pipelines and electrical networks. The basic prices for measurement do not include the costs of installing scaffolding, scaffolding, drainage, pitting, the cost of which is determined by additional calculations. And finally, the fourth part proposes to determine the prices for various geodetic, auxiliary and related works. In the appendices to the CBC collection for engineering and geodetic surveys, coefficients are given for prices for survey, measurement and geodetic work, regional coefficients for the salary of design and survey organizations. The shown examples of estimates and calculations for estimating the cost of engineering, geodetic and survey work demonstrate the basic algorithm of work according to the CBC data collections. Experienced estimators will do for you the work of preparing estimates for design and survey, engineering and geodetic, geological, meteorological and related types of work efficiently and at a reasonable price.
The estimate for the entire complex of projected works is compiled using the Unified Estimated Aggregated Prices for Topographic and Geodetic Works (SUR-2002).
Estimated calculations performed in Table. 11, and the rationale for a set of estimated standards and regional allowances is made in the appendix to the estimate - table. 12.
Estimated calculations must be started by filling out the application (Table 12) in the following sequence:
1. In column 2, write out in the order of the names of the works.
2. Based on the data in Table. 1 fill in box 3.
3. From the RMS-2002, select the rate of the unit of work and write it down in column 7, and the number of the standard - in column 4. In columns 9 and 11, write down, respectively, the share of the wages of engineers and workers in the price, and in columns 13 and 15 - the labor costs of engineers and workers per unit of work. If notes were taken into account when choosing a price, then the number of the corresponding note must be recorded in column 5.
4. In column 8, it is necessary to write down the correction factors for estimated prices, and in columns 10 and 12 - respectively, correction factors for the wages of engineers and workers.
5. In columns 14 and 16, you need to write down the correction factors for the labor costs of engineers and workers.
6. It is necessary to determine the estimated standards - the price (column 17), the wages of engineers (column 18) and workers (column 19) by multiplying the tabular standards (columns 7, 9 and 11, respectively) by correction factors (columns 8, 10 and 12, respectively) . When applying several correction factors to the tabular standard, the latter are multiplied. When determining the estimated standard of labor costs (columns 20 and 21), the same calculation scheme is used - the tabular standard is multiplied by the corresponding correction factor.
7. It is necessary to determine the regional allowances for the wages of engineers and workers (columns 23 and 24, respectively) by multiplying the standard wages, taking into account the correction factors (columns 18 and 19) by the coefficient selected from Appendix 5 to the RMS-2002.
8. It is necessary to determine the regional allowance to the standard rate (column 22) by summing the allowances for the wages of engineers and workers (columns 23 and 24).
9. In column 25, it is necessary to record the cost standard established for the enterprise for organizing and eliminating work.
After filling out the application, we proceed to filling out the estimate (Table 11) in the following sequence:
Columns 2-4 are filled in based on the data in Table. 1. In columns 5-7, respectively, the results of multiplying the amount of work in physical terms (column 4) by estimated standards are recorded (columns 17-19 of Table 12).
The allowance for the main expenses (column 8) is determined by multiplying the regional allowance for the main expenses (column 22 of Table 12) by the amount of work.
The main expenses for the production of works, taking into account allowances (column 9), are determined by summing up the main expenses without allowances (column 5) and allowances for basic expenses (column 8). Columns 10 and 11 are determined by summing columns 6 and 7 with the product, respectively, columns 23 and 24 of Table. 12 for the amount of work.
To determine labor costs in man-months (columns 12, 13), it is necessary to multiply columns 20 and 21, respectively, of Table. 12 divided by the amount of work and the works received by the average number of working days in a month (21.1).
In column 14, the data of column 25 of the table is transferred. 12.
The costs of carrying out organizational and liquidation measures (column 15) are determined according to the standard established for the enterprise as a percentage (column 14) of the main costs (column 9).
The main expenses, taking into account the costs of organizational and liquidation activities (column 16), are equal to the sum of the main expenses (column 9) and the costs of organizational and liquidation activities (column 15).
Overhead costs (column 17) are calculated according to the standard established for the enterprise as a percentage of the main costs (column 16). The overhead rate is set for this enterprise at a rate of 20%.
General expenses(column 18) are determined by summing up the main and overhead costs (columns 16 and 17).
Table 11
For the production of topographic and geodetic works at the facility
Enterprise __ Benta LLC ____________ topographic and geodetic works ___ yes _______
Overhead rate _____20%_____ laying of centers and benchmarks ______yes_______
District wage supplement at location District wage supplement at facility ___1___
location of cameral production ___no_______ Surcharge for special conditions labor____no_________
Allowance for work in the Far North (ITR / workers) yes / no Territorial zone __________________
| № П/П | Type and name of work in the order of technological sequence | Scope of work in physical terms | Basic expenses excluding regional allowances, rub. | Supplement to basic expenses, rub. | Total for the production of works (including allowances), rub. | Costs for organizational and liquidation activities | Estimated total | |||||||||||
| Unit | Total | Total | including salary | basic expenses | including salary | labor costs, person-month | Basic expenses | Overheads | Total | |||||||||
| engineers | slave | engineers | Slave. | engineers | slave. | Standard,% | Amount, rub. | |||||||||||
| Reconnaissance of points of polygonometry of the 1st category | Paragraph | 2837,8 | 242,4 | 341,8 | 584,2 | 484,8 | 683,6 | 0,049289 | 0,105213 | 684,4 | 4106,4 | 821,28 | 4927,68 | |||||
| Bookmark soil centers | Center | 4712,8 | 959,8 | 2787,8 | 7500,6 | 1919,6 | 0,178199 | 0,533649 | 1500,12 | 9000,72 | 1800,14 | 10800,86 | ||||||
| Angle measurements | Paragraph | 13166,16 | 1851,92 | 1324,12 | 3176,04 | 16342,2 | 3703,84 | 2648,24 | 0,578578 | 0,602464 | 3268,44 | 19610,64 | 3922,13 | 23532,77 | ||||
| Linear measurements | Side | 8744,4 | 1231,92 | 880,8 | 2112,72 | 10857,12 | 2463,84 | 1761,6 | 0,384455 | 0,400379 | 2171,424 | 13028,54 | 2605,71 | 15634,25 | ||||
| Class III leveling reconnaissance | Paragraph | 2603,4 | 367,8 | 598,8 | 3202,2 | 735,6 | 2,112796 | 2,112796 | 640,44 | 3842,64 | 768,53 | 4611,17 | ||||||
| Laying ground benchmarks | km | 44739,3 | 1274,8 | 2974,0 | 4248,8 | 48988,1 | 2549,6 | 2,112796 | 2,112796 | 9797,62 | 58785,72 | 11757,14 | 70542,86 | |||||
| Leveling class III | Benchmark | 29506,2 | 2476,8 | 4309,2 | 36292,2 | 4953,6 | 8618,4 | 2,112796 | 2,112796 | 7258,44 | 43550,64 | 8710,13 | 52260,77 | |||||
| Class IV leveling | km | 10693,8 | 549,3 | 1841,4 | 2390,7 | 13084,5 | 1098,6 | 3682,8 | 0,172038 | 0,882938 | 2616,9 | 15701,4 | 3140,28 | 18841,68 | ||||
TOTAL RUB 201,152.0
Table 12
ATTACHMENT 1
to the estimate for the production of topographic and geodetic works at the facility
| №PP | Type, name of work in the order of technological sequence | Estimated standards | Estimated standards, taking into account the amendments. coefficient | Regional allowances, rub. | Cost standards for organization and liquidation of work, % | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ter. zones or categories of difficulty | Table / norms | Notes on pricing | Tab. in decree. by application estimated rass. | Rates, rub | Labor costs, man-days | Rate, rub. | Labor costs, man-days | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total | Amend. coefficient | including salary | engineers | Amend. Coeff. | workers | Amend. Coeff. | Total | Incl. salary pay | Total | To zar. board | |||||||||||||||
| engineers | Amend. Coeff. | workers | Amend. Coeff. | engineers | workers | engineers | workers | engineers | workers | ||||||||||||||||
| Polygonometry 1st category | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Reconnaissance | II | 1.18/12 | - | 104,18 | 1,362 | 8,90 | 1,362 | 12,55 | 1,362 | 0,052 | - | 0,111 | - | 141,89 | 12,12 | 17,09 | 0,052 | 0,111 | 29,21 | 12,12 | 17,09 | ||||
| Bookmark soil centers | II | 1.22/2 | - | 123,05 | 1,915 | 25,06 | 1,915 | 47,73 | 1,915 | 0,188 | - | 0,563 | - | 235,64 | 47,99 | 91,40 | 0,188 | 0,563 | 139,39 | 47,99 | 91,40 | ||||
| Angular Observations | IV | 1.23/29 | - | - | 470,22 | - | 66,14 | - | 47,29 | - | 0,436 | - | 0,454 | - | 470,22 | 66,14 | 47,29 | 0,436 | 0,454 | 113,43 | 66,14 | 47,29 | |||
| Linear measurements | II | 1.23/22 | - | - | 364,35 | - | 51,33 | - | 36,70 | - | 0,338 | - | 0,352 | - | 364,35 | 51,33 | 36,70 | 0,338 | 0,352 | 88,03 | 51,33 | 36,70 | |||
| Leveling class III | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Reconnaissance | I | 2.1/10 | - | 31,93 | 1,359 | 2,83 | 1,359 | 4,51 | 1,359 | 0,019 | - | 0,040 | - | 43,39 | 3,85 | 6,13 | 0,019 | 0,040 | 9,98 | 3,85 | 6,13 | ||||
| Laying ground benchmarks | II | 2.5/24 | - | - | 4473,93 | - | 127,48 | - | 297,40 | - | 0,954 | - | 3,026 | - | 4473,93 | 127,48 | 297,40 | 0,954 | 3,026 | 424,88 | 127,48 | 297,40 | |||
| Leveling | IV | 2.7/24 | - | - | 491,77 | - | 41,28 | - | 71,82 | - | 0,290 | - | 0,743 | - | 491,77 | 41,28 | 71,82 | 0,290 | 0,743 | 113,1 | 41,28 | 71,82 | |||
| Class IV leveling | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Leveling | IV | 2.7/33 | - | - | 356,46 | - | 18,31 | - | 61,38 | - | 0,121 | - | 0,621 | - | 356,46 | 18,31 | 61,38 | 0,121 | 0,621 | 79,69 | 18,31 | 61,38 | |||
Conclusion
In the course project, design estimates were made in the organization of geodetic work in the Voronezh region. The calculation results can be characterized by the following technical and economic indicators at the work site:
o the field work is carried out within 162 days (about 5.4 months): from early May to mid-October;
o the scope of work amounted to 11.81 brig.-months.
o the composition of the field unit includes 12 people, of which 4 people are engineers: this is the head of the party - an engineer (1), a surveyor (1), a technician of I (1) and II categories (1); workers - 8: measurer of the 3rd (2) and 2nd category (4), installer of the 3rd category (2);
o payroll fund of the field unit - 45,370.12 rubles;
o estimated cost of field work - 201,152.0 rubles.
computer programto automate the preparation of monetary estimates to determine the cost of the planned engineering and geodetic surveys.
Program "Polygon: Estimate of geodetic works"- this isstandalone program, which has an intuitive user interface, is simple and convenient, serves for preparing a cash budget to calculate the cost of the planned survey work.
The program is executed in accordance with the document " Directory base prices on the engineering survey for construction. Engineering and geodetic surveys" and is used in determining the cost of engineering surveys (survey works) for construction (reconstruction, expansion, operation and liquidation of buildings and structures) by organizations performing engineering surveys for capital construction.
The program contains the necessary reference data on the cost of all types of work, based on accounting additional options if necessary. Also, the cost is calculated in accordance with the composition and modern production technology. field and cameral engineering and geodetic works.
The program, based on the entered quantitative data and the selected types of work, calculates the cost separately for each type, as well as in general according to the estimate. Ready estimate can be printed.Capabilities:
New in version:
Version 3.1.1 from 03/22/2016
Compliance with the standard:
The program has been developed in accordance with regulatory documents:
System requirements:
Computer 2004 and newer: Pentium Celeron 1000 MHz/ 512 Mb.
Windows Vista operating system Windows 7(with Service Pack 1)/ 8 / 8.1 / 10.
Microsoft Excel any of the 2000/ XP/ 2003/ 2007/ 2010/ 2013 versions.
Microsoft .NET Framework 4.5 or higher.
Programs for budgeting:
|
Software package |
The calculation is performed in Table. 7 "Estimated costs for the production of topographic and geodetic works."
In columns 1, 2, 3 the type, units of measurement and scope of work on the technical project are indicated (the values of the tables in sections 4.2.2., 4.2.3., 4.3.1. are repeated).
Table 7
|
Type of projected works, name of work processes in order technological follow- validity |
Scope of work in kind expression |
Basic expenses excluding regional allowances, rub. |
Surcharge to the main expenses |
|||
|
Including salary |
||||||
|
Leveling II class |
Kpr \u003d 0.761 Specialist 186.004 Working 407.714 Ʃ = 593.718 |
|||||
Columns 4, 5, 6- the product of prices, salaries of specialists and workers from columns 17, 18, 19 of Table. 4 for the scope of work from column 3 of Table. 5.
In column 7 surcharges are issued for basic expenses. They are set according to the table. 1 "Instructions on the application of estimated prices and standards" RMS and are calculated as follows.
At the object under consideration, a regional coefficient of 1.50 was used. Alpine, desert, waterless coefficients in the area of work are not applied.
In accordance with the fractional part of the district coefficient (.50) from Table. 1 of the Instructions to the RMS collection, we select the coefficient for field work (Kpr). It is equal to 0.761.
We multiply the wages of specialists (244.421 rubles) and workers (535.762 rubles) from columns 5 and 6 by this coefficient and get bonuses to their wages.
Continuation of Table 7
For specialists, the allowance will be 186.004 rubles, and for workers 407.714 rubles.
The sum of the two surcharges will give the total surcharge to the rates
593.718 rubles. Allowances are recorded in column 7 of the table. 7.
Column 8. The main expenses, taking into account allowances, are calculated by adding the main expenses from column 4 (3.404.805 rubles) and the allowances to the rate from column 7 (593.718 rubles).
It turns out the cost of the main costs at the leveling facility is equal to 3.998.523 rubles.
Column 9. To the salary of specialists from column 5 (244.421 rubles), an allowance is added for specialists from the calculations for column 7 (186.004 rubles).
It turns out wage specialists, taking into account the allowance of 430.425 rubles.
Column 10. To the wages of workers from column 6 (535.762 rubles), we add an allowance to the wages of workers from the calculations for column 7 (407.714 rubles). It turns out the wages of workers, taking into account allowances in the amount of 943.476 rubles.
Received 430.425 rubles and 943.476 rubles - this is the payroll of specialists and workers of the team at this facility. If the team overspends it, this will reduce the profit margin of the enterprise. Therefore, careful study of all sections of the technical project during its development is very important.
Column 11, 12. Calculated by multiplying the labor costs of specialists from column 20 of Table. 7 (0.831 man-days) and workers from column 21 of table 7 (2.887 man-days) for the amount of work from column 3 of table. 6 and dividing the results of multiplication by the number of working days in a month (21 days).
It turns out that specialists must complete their part of the work at the facility for 91.06 man-months, and workers for 316.2 man-months.
The calculation of the estimated cost of work at the facility according to the estimated aggregated prices is completed in the same way as in the justification of the estimated cost of the project by direct calculation.
Continuation of Table 7
To the main costs at the facility, it is necessary to add the costs of organizational and liquidation activities and overhead costs.
Count. 13. The main expenses are 3.998.523 rubles. The costs of carrying out organizational and liquidation measures are determined in the amount of 30% of the cost of the main costs for the production of work and will amount to 1,199,557 rubles.
Column 14. Overhead costs are calculated in the amount of 25% of the cost of basic expenses or 999.630 rubles.
Column 15. Summing up the main costs (3.998.523 rubles) with organizational and liquidation costs (1.199.557 rubles) and overhead costs (999.630 rubles), we get the estimated cost of leveling work equal to 6.197.710 rubles.
Box 16. The estimated cost of a unit of the scope of work is determined by dividing the estimated cost of work on the process from column 15 (6.197.710 rubles) by the scope of work in column 3 (2300 kilometers).
The estimated cost of 1 kilometer of leveling is 2695 rubles.
In the above example, the calculation of the estimated cost of work at the facility was performed in two ways. In this regard, it begs the comparison of the estimated cost, performed by direct calculation with the estimated cost, determined by the prices.
The results of calculating estimates 3 and 5 cannot be the same, since the collections of STG and RMS are calculated in prices and standards of 2002, and in tables 1 and 3 the salary, insurance premiums laid down at the level of 2014, materials, depreciation, depreciation and transport - from the collections of 2002. In this regard, the estimated cost determined by direct calculation and the estimated cost calculated at aggregated prices cannot coincide.
