Panel house 25 floors. Design and construction of a multi-storey (25-storey) multi-apartment residential building of superior comfort. Subscription for updates

Construction of a complex of 25-storey residential buildings - 3 residential multi-apartment detached houses with built-in premises, 2 detached underground parking lots and 1 surface parking lot, transformer substation. The first stage of construction includes two buildings of a residential building - building 1 and building 2, an underground parking lot and a transformer substation. The second stage of construction includes one building of a residential building - building 3 and an underground parking lot. The third stage of construction includes a surface parking lot.

The building is a residential apartment building 25 storey building and refers to the 1st stage of construction. This stage includes two buildings of a residential building, identical to each other.
Floors - 26 floors.
Residential floors - 25.
The degree of fire resistance of the building is I.
The constructive fire hazard class of the building is C0.

The height of the building from the level of the daytime surface of the earth (before the start of earthworks):

  • to the top of the parapet 80.44 m;
  • from the mark of the adjacent territory to the floor of the first floor (0.000) 0.17 m;
  • from the mark of the adjacent territory to the mark of the bottom of the window opening of the upper floor 72.60 m.
In accordance with the town planning plan land plot№RU78100000-11878, the building does not exceed the maximum height of 85 m.

The building is a detached 25-storey residential multi-apartment section with a basement and a technical attic.
In the basement are Technical buildings for maintenance of built-in office premises and residential floors. The height of the floor is 2.8m, the height of the basement rooms in the cleanliness is 2.54m.
The basement has 2 emergency exits and two pits with a window measuring 1.3x0.9 (h), separate entrances to the fire extinguishing pump room and the ITP room are also provided.
Technical attic with a height of 1.8 m from the floor to the bottom of the ceiling. Technical space is used for laying engineering communications. The entrance to the technical attic is carried out from a non-smokeable staircase of the H-1 type through the vestibule.
On the first floor there are built-in rooms office purpose area from 80 to 250 sq.m. The height of the floor is 4.3 m, the height of the office premises in cleanliness is 3.36 m.
The exits from each office are isolated from the residential part. Each office has bathrooms for MMGN.

Also on the ground floor are located: the entrance group of the residential part, the control room, combined with the concierge room and other technical premises that serve the residential building.
Accommodation of apartments is provided from the 2nd to the 25th floors. The height of the residential floor is 3.0m. The height of the residential part in cleanliness is 2.55 m, the height of common areas in cleanliness is 2.3m.
In accordance with the increased number of storeys, the building has a smoke-free staircase of the 1st type with a transition through the outer air zone and a separate exit to the street, as well as smoke removal from the floor corridors on each residential floor.
The building has 4 elevators to serve residents. These elevators have stops from the 1st to the 26th floor. Elevator No. 4, with a carrying capacity of 1000 kg, is intended for residents of the house and for transporting fire departments. The shaft of this elevator is isolated from the shafts of other elevators; air is provided in it. Lift doors for transportation of fire departments - EIS60. Doors of other elevators - EIS30.

The elevator ride almost ended in tragedy in one of the residential complexes in the Leninsky district of the Moscow region. People descended from the 25th floor. At some point, a metal cable broke, breaking through the ceiling of the cabin, and the elevator suddenly flew down. The life of the passengers was saved by a safety mechanism. Moreover, according to the residents, this is not the first incident with lifts. TV channel report "Moscow-24".

Semyon Mashkov and his site neighbor Georgy Kurganov recall what they felt at the moment the elevator fell from a height of several floors.

"We entered the elevator on the 25th floor, went for a walk with the dog, pressed the button, the elevator started moving and after about 40 seconds there was a sharp bang. Then it was not clear what happened, then there was an acceleration, we sat down, the elevator was full of dust, the ceiling collapsed, and the chain fell through the ceiling," says Semyon Mashkov.

“Some one was shaking at first, right for a second, then abruptly somehow everything was in the dust. I managed to jump to the door, and then a minute later we saw what happened, what the consequences were, what collapsed, and this chain was just lying around,” — says Georgy Kurganov.

It turned out that the elevator had fallen between the first and second floors. The victims had to sit in a locked cabin for almost an hour. Failed to call the dispatcher.

“We heard the dispatcher, but there was no feedback. The concierge had already called the engineers by phone, after 40 minutes he came up,” explains Semyon Mashkov.

Despite the fact that the house is new, it has been rented out a little more than a year back, with elevators here, according to the residents, a constant problem.

- Seemed like a house superior comfort, as if elite - a brick, a monolith. Unfortunately, problems have been accompanying us since then, especially elevators - they are constantly breaking down.

All the same housing complex, the elevator in the building opposite. This summer, Anastasia Komarova and her 4-year-old daughter became hostages of the cargo compartment there. After what happened, the girl is still afraid to go down the elevator.

“We drove two floors, there was a terrible rattle, and the blow was very strong. So strong that our bike fell on its side, and we could hardly stand on our feet,” recalls Anastasia Komarova.

Residents of this entrance, after the fall of the elevator with Anastasia and her daughter, try to avoid traveling in this particular cabin. Those who live below the floors, and the house is 25-story, do try to go up and down on foot.

- We constantly make applications, but the reaction to them is not as fast as we would like. We want this to get better.

After another emergency with an elevator, Georgy and Semyon decided to write a statement to the police and intend to demand management company understand technical condition elevator facilities in the house.

Why the Soviet panel houses not to look without tears, how house-building plants have gone from shovels to robots, what can be in common between elite classes and comfort? BN learned firsthand how a modern panel house is built.

It would take a long time to list what is cool in the work of a journalist (and what is not very good). But one of the most obvious advantages, it seems to me, is the opportunity to see with your own eyes how certain processes work, to get first-hand explanations. The most memorable episodes of my ten-year journalistic practice were visits to manufacturing enterprises- from hydroelectric power plants and car assembly, which inspired the feeling that the uprising of machines will begin precisely with car factories, to agricultural companies - where else will a city dweller be able to see live how robots milk a cow!

Real estate is something that most people cannot do without throughout their lives. Of course, before buying a home, many are interested in what technology the house was built on, what materials were used. You don’t want to freeze in your own apartment in the winter.

There are many types and series of houses, at the editorial board we decided to focus on prefabricated panel houses that are common today. The panel gained great popularity due to lower cost than that of a monolith or brick, and the speed of construction using panel technology is higher. The cost of an object directly depends on the consumption of materials, as well as on the timing of construction: building very quickly and very slowly is equally expensive.

In order to find out how such houses are built, we turned to LSR Group, one of the construction companies that make extensive use of seamless panel house building technology, and in mid-July met with the head of the production and technical department, Alexei Perepelkin.
We decided that the residential complex " New Ohta located in the east of the city. Now it presents different stages of implementation, which will allow you to see with your own eyes the technological stages of implementation - from the first floors under construction to the already occupied houses.

The whole world is striving for manufacturability of construction, trying to make it so that as little as possible has to be done by hand, and from the point of view of this desire, the production of parts at the factory with subsequent assembly at the construction site is, in general, an ideal. Now the production part of LSR Group includes about 30 enterprises and covers reinforced concrete products, foundation piles, concrete mixtures, mortars, bricks, aerated concrete, sand and crushed stone.

For example, a 24-storey point house requires about 3 thousand rubles. reinforced concrete products different configurations. The speed of construction itself largely depends on the well-functioning of logistics processes. On average, the construction of a point multi-storey building using panel technology takes about two years.

Stages of construction of a 25-storey point building of LSR Group

Zero cycle: piles are driven in, LSR makes the basement and the first floor monolithic, which is necessary for the rigidity of the building

After that, the installation of panels begins, which represent the skeleton of the building, they are mounted up to the roof

Subcontractors enter the business, the established pool of which, taking into account the volume of construction, includes several dozen companies. Roofers begin to do the roofing, at the same time the insertion of windows begins

Facade workers immediately follow the window makers, who stuff mineral wool from the outside, then plaster it, putty it, and paint it. At the same time, they try to match the more or less warm period

Inside, specialized organizations install heating, ventilation, water supply systems, etc., then the apartments are finished

As for the production technology itself, it is specifically at the plants of LSR Group that automated system design. If you explain on the fingers, then flash cards with drawings are inserted into the machines, and the equipment, virtually without the participation of the installer, puts the mixture into a special form, compacts, grinds and releases the panel. The system allows you to quickly make changes - the architect just needs to redraw the drawings, release them in in electronic format, and the production line is almost immediately rebuilt.

The very principle of conveyor production has remained the same, but now robots are used, and earlier, Alexey recalls, at construction plants, mixtures were thrown with shovels and then leveled by hand. Well, a lot depends on the culture of production: before, builders could simply give up on some imperfections.

In Russia, the culture of production and, in general, the performance of any kind of work is still far from the culture of Finnish developers, whose panel houses are set as an example for Russian construction companies- the latter are constantly accused of losing their panels to their foreign counterparts.

“Have you seen 25-storey panel houses in Finland? In St. Petersburg, of course, low-rise panels are also being built, but the design and technological operations in the construction of high-rise panel houses significantly different from low-rise ones. And, of course, this is due to the culture of production, including the careful handling of building materials, which we did not have and which is not created in one year. But the situation is improving. I came to work at house-building factory No. 4 in 1984, worked there for ten years, in “ LSR Group“I have been working for 19 years and I can say that there are positive changes,” Alexey explains, as we walk among the panels painted in light green color.

80
24-storey houses can be built from panels that will cover the distance between St. Petersburg and Moscow

In addition, the consciousness of buyers is changing. “Clients' requirements for the quality of housing are growing more and more. This forces developers to develop technologies, select contractors, train them, and develop finishing standards. When you build 500 thousand square meters. m per year, it is impossible to think through each house individually, so standards must be developed,” he adds.

If you do not take into account the Finnish experience, I, like many potential buyers, are scared off by an unpresentable appearance Soviet panel houses with bare seams and peeling gray cladding, and it’s hard to get rid of the thought that the same thing could happen to my newly acquired modern panel.

“Did you know that old-style panels are almost impossible to paint? The panels of the previous generation, in general, are still being produced, since there are no technologies that are only good and only bad, each has its own advantages and disadvantages. But those panels most often had a textured layer, made at the factory in the form of tiles, or textured concrete, and it is very difficult to restore. In addition, the Soviet Union did not have a developed sense of responsibility for collective property, so it was almost impossible to collect money from the residents to paint the house. Now with mandatory contributions to the fund overhaul we are taking steps towards caring for collective property. As a car needs to be serviced during operation, so does a house. Actually, in many respects this is why Soviet panel houses now look the way they look. It is difficult to compare panels with that period. Now, if you look at our house, - Aleksey stretches his finger towards the inhabited high-rise building, - you will not be able to determine whether it is panel or, say, monolithic, since there are no seams, it is plastered and painted.

9 mm Makarov pistol cartridge
unable to penetrate 120 mm reinforced concrete panel

In suture technology, just the seams are the weakest point. “I now live in a house built using seam technology, and the seams have to be redone every five to six years. The sun, wind, water make them unusable, therefore, the seams begin to leak. In seamless technology, a reinforced concrete panel is used, on which a heater is put on. We can freely change the thickness of the insulation, which is impossible in seam panels. In addition, there are physical moments, nod if you understand in the course of the conversation, ”Alexey looks at me with some doubt.

In physics, there is the concept of “dew point”: when the temperature is minus outside, plus inside, then zero is somewhere in the middle, and condensate falls around zero. The farther from the inner surface is the insulation, the further the dew point from the room. In a three-layer panel using seam technology, the insulation is inside, therefore, in any case, it works worse than the one on the outside. Pushing the dew point as far as possible to the outer surface will make the house warmer and less humid. In addition, the closer the insulation is to the outer wall, the higher the vapor permeability should be - it is necessary that the moisture that forms in the insulation can evaporate freely. If the insulation is filled with a layer of concrete in a three-layer panel, it is clear that this layer will not provide proper evaporation.

30 days
The Great Owl can be kept in the Leningrad Zoo for an amount equal to the cost of two reinforced concrete panels

There is an opinion that panel houses can only be in the low price segment. In response to this, Alexey stunned that in terms of sanitary and epidemiological requirements, there is no particular difference between expensive and cheap housing. “Insolation, the quality of water supply, heating, ventilation - everything is done according to the standards. Society is developing in the direction of greater comfort,” he states, adding that the company has panel facilities with additional expensive options that are business class, for example, the Europa City residential complex on Medikov Avenue. The facade is made ventilated, ceramic hollow tiles were used as a facing material. “The fact that the complex was built using panel technology does not in any way reduce the quality of life. Any building should be considered from the point of view of living comfort. But it is difficult to build an elite house from panels, since panel housing construction has limitations on space-planning solutions: a room of 50 sq. m not to do. If you can drill holes in monolithic reinforced concrete where you want to drill, then you won’t be able to behave freely with the panel, ”concluded Alexey.

It cannot be argued that the current panel is the limit and nothing better will be invented. The development of building technologies goes in parallel with other areas, with chemistry, with the processing of materials. Something new appears, it gets into construction. “A house is a conglomeration of all things that exist on the market. I still found the times when elderly designers said: “Plastic pipes for heating? It can not be!" It will still develop,” Alexey assures in parting.

By the way, we have launched a channel in Telegram, where we publish the most interesting news about real estate and real estate technologies. If you want to be one of the first to read these materials, then subscribe: t.me/ners_news .

Subscription for updates

I am preparing a similar request to the Ministry of Construction, if there is something to add, please:
Please inform us that there is no need to develop special technical conditions (STU) for the designed multi-apartment single-section residential building of functional fire hazard class F1.3, fire resistance degree I, functional fire hazard class C0, height (according to clause 3.1 of SP1.13130.2009) less than 75m, total floor area less than 500m2. The exit from the floors is carried out in a non-smokeable stairwell of type H1. It is planned to equip the building with appropriate fire protection systems according to SP 5.13130.2009; SP 3.13130.2009; SP 7.13130.2013; SP 10.13130.2009 and others. This building is designed as a 26-storey one.
The basis for this letter was the observation of the C-th examination, according to which, water consumption for buildings with a height higher and more than those indicated in the table should be accepted and agreed in the manner established by order No. 36 of the Ministry of Regional Development of 01.04.2008 according to paragraph 1.3, 5.2 SP 8.13130.2009; p.p. 1.1, 4.1.1 SP 10.13130.2009.
We believe this requirement expert far-fetched and unfounded.
The reference to clause 1.3 of SP 8.13130.2009 was incorrectly provided by the expert, because to reach the required level fire safety of the designed building do not apply technical solutions different from the decisions provided for by the sets of rules, due to the absence of the need for this.
The reference to paragraph 5.2 of SP 8.13130.2009 was incorrectly given by the expert, since the water consumption for external fire extinguishing of the designed building is assumed to be the maximum value of 30l / s according to the next column of the corresponding line of Table 2 of SP 8.13130.2009 (i.e. for a building of a larger construction volume, which generally corresponds to the procedure determined by the explanations of the Federal State Budgetary Institution VNIIPO EMERCOM of Russia).
Previously, TRoTPB Art. 68 hours 7, the following procedure was established: Water consumption for external fire extinguishing of buildings, the height or volume of which is greater than the height or volume indicated in the table ... must be increased by at least 25%.
The height of the designed 26-storey building does not exceed the height of a similar type of 25-storey buildings - up to 75m, by reducing the height of a typical floor within the allowable value. The required water consumption for external fire extinguishing of buildings of the same height, but different number of storeys, from the point of view of hydraulics, remains unchanged.
Design solutions for water supply, incl. for fire-fighting needs of a 26-storey building were adopted on the basis of the Technical Specifications for connection to water supply networks issued by the network organization of the water supply system, in compliance with the requirement of SP 31.13330.2012, clause 5.11: Minimum free head in the water supply network of a settlement at maximum household and drinking water consumption at the entrance to the building above the ground, it should be taken for a one-story building at least 10m, with a larger number of storeys, 4m should be added to each floor.
Missed by fire expert important nuance in reading this norm, namely, that in the notes to table 2 of SP 8.13130.2009 there is no regulatory requirement for the need for STU for buildings KFPO F1, F2, F3, F4, in contrast to notes 5 to tables 3 and 4 of SP 8.13130.2009 - for KFPO F5 buildings: “Water consumption for external fire extinguishing of buildings with volumes exceeding those indicated in tables 3 and 4 is subject to justification in special specifications". Legally, the extension to residential buildings of the requirements for the development of STUs of a clearly limited scope, which is valid only for industrial buildings and does not apply to residential buildings, is not lawful. The codes of practice (including SP 8.13130.2009) are the norms of direct direct action.
The reference to clause 1.1 of SP 10.13130.2009 was incorrectly provided by the expert, because to achieve the required level of fire safety of the designed building, technical solutions other than the solutions provided for by the codes of practice are not used, due to the lack of this need.
The reference to paragraph 4.1.1 of SP 10.13130.2009 was incorrectly provided by the expert, since the water consumption for internal fire extinguishing of the designed building is assumed to be 3x2.9l/s, which is higher than the maximum value of 3x2.5l/s according to Table 1 of SP 10.13130.2009. According to the clarifications of the Federal State Budgetary Institution VNIIPO EMERCOM of Russia, the number of jets indicated in tables 1 and 2 of SP 10.13130.2009 is intended for calculating the fire water supply pumping station and is not associated with the localization of a specific fire source. The pumping station of the internal fire-fighting water supply system adopted by the project, as well as the water supply scheme, pipeline diameters make it possible to supply a larger number of fire jets of the required flow rate than determined by SP 10.13130.2009.
The fire expert missed an important nuance in reading this norm, namely, that in the notes to table 1 of SP 10.13130.2009 there is no regulatory requirement for the need for STU for buildings KFPO F1, F2, F3, F4, in contrast to notes 1; 2 to Table 2 of SP 10.13130.2009 - for KFPO F5 buildings: “1. The "-" sign indicates the need to develop STU to justify water consumption. 2. For buildings, the degree of fire resistance and the fire hazard category of which are not indicated together in the table, the development of STU is required to justify water consumption. Legally, the extension to residential buildings of the requirements for the development of STUs of a clearly limited scope, which is valid only for industrial buildings and does not apply to residential buildings, is not lawful. Codes of rules (including SP 8.13130.2009) are norms of direct direct action.
Previously valid "fire regulations" SNiP 2.01.02.85; SNiP II-2-80 did not contain restrictions on the height or number of floors. In SNiP 2.08.01-85; SNiP 2.04.01-85; SNiP 2.04.02-84; SNiP 2.08.01-89 * contained provisions that these rules and regulations apply to the design of residential buildings up to 25 floors inclusive. With subsequent changes regulatory framework, the conceptual criteria (dimensions) of the height of buildings (from the number of floors to the size in meters) were changed to determine the limitation of the effect of the relevant ND on the designed buildings. According to the current procedure, established by SP 4.13130.2013 p. 1.2; SNiP 21-01-97* clause 1.5; SP 54.13330.2012 p. 1.1; also updated SNiP 2.04.01-85 SP 30.13330.2012 p. 1.1 and others, STUs should be developed for residential buildings with a height of more than 75m (and not more than 25 floors), respectively, justification design decisions for external and internal fire extinguishing should be developed for residential buildings with a height of more than 75m, and should also be justified in the STU.
Requirements for external and internal fire water supply (discussed tables and notes to them) were not included in the updated editions of SNiP 2.04.01-85; SNiP 2.04.02-84: SP 30.13330.2012 and SP 31.13330.2012, respectively.
With respect to SNiP 2.04.01-85; SNiP 2.04.02-84 were previously published (“Rationing, standardization and certification in construction”, N 6, 2003) clarifications of the technical regulation department of the GOSSTROY of the Russian Federation, including: “It should be borne in mind that the requirements of these documents are based on provisions of SNiP II-2-80 "Fire safety standards for the design of buildings and structures. ... In connection with the introduction from 01.01.1998. SNiP 21-01-97 * and a new classification .... ".
SP 8.13130.2009 and SP 10.13130.2009 were developed by FGU VNIIPO EMERCOM of Russia and approved by orders of the EMERCOM of Russia. Most of the regulatory requirements of SP 8.13130.2009 and SP 10.13130.2009 are borrowed from the old editions of SNiP 2.04.02-84 and SNiP 2.04.01-85, table 1 of SP 10.13130.2009 completely duplicates table 1 of SNiP 2.04.01-85, table 2 of SP 8.13130.2009 duplicates Table 6 of SNiP 2.04.02-84 (with the exception of the note: Water consumption for external fire extinguishing of buildings with a height or volume exceeding those indicated in Table 6 ... must be accepted and agreed in the prescribed manner), i.e. SP 8.13130.2009 and SP 10.13130.2009 also do not take into account the introduction of a new classification since 1998 according to the degree of fire resistance of buildings and structures. Accordingly, the specified tables of SP 8.13130.2009 and SP 10.13130.2009 have not been amended in relation to determining the height of buildings (from the number of floors to the size in meters), unlike all other current regulatory documents.
The illiterate requirements contained in normative documents, lead to their ambiguous interpretation, entail the need to execute excessive far-fetched costly decisions, are an additional administrative barrier for the business community, creating a corruption component in the activities oversight bodies. The rule-making activity of the EMERCOM of Russia causes certain criticism, incl. from the side of the first persons of the state: V.V. Putin: "... either the Ministry of Emergency Situations, then Rospotrebnadzor, then fire services, other structures ... introduce their new rules without coordination with the Ministry of Construction, and one can imagine the position of investors, developers. In As a result, the entire design base of future construction projects simply falls apart: everything needs to be recalculated, redone, and additional funds need to be spent, and, of course, time. This state of affairs, of course, needs to be changed and business-like, effective interagency cooperation needs to be built." http://www.kremlin.ru/events/president...
The link to order No. 36 dated 04/01/2008 of the Ministry of Regional Development of the Russian Federation was not correctly provided by the expert, since this order was canceled by the Ministry of Construction of Russia at least twice, incl. Order No. 406 dated July 28, 2014 and Order No. 248 dated April 15, 2016.
Recently, the Ministry economic development The Russian Federation, the Ministry of Construction of Russia, and the department of Glavgosexpertiza subordinate to the Ministry of Construction are actively working to eliminate cases of requirements for the development of STUs in the absence of such a need on the part of the local examination authorities. Unfortunately, the leadership of the C-th examination is not able to independently understand such a simple issue of the applicability of the norms, and continues to practice a bureaucratic approach of refusals on formal grounds to make informed decisions.

Sincerely, date, signature

Construction of a complex of 25-storey residential buildings - 3 residential multi-apartment detached houses with built-in premises, 2 detached underground parking lots and 1 surface parking lot, transformer substation. The first stage of construction includes two buildings of a residential building - building 1 and building 2, an underground parking lot and a transformer substation. The second stage of construction includes one building of a residential building - building 3 and an underground parking lot. The third stage of construction includes a surface parking lot.

The building is a residential multi-apartment 25-storey building and belongs to the 1st stage of construction. This stage includes two buildings of a residential building, identical to each other.

Floors - 26 floors.

Residential floors - 25.

The degree of fire resistance of the building is I.

The constructive fire hazard class of the building is C0.

The height of the building from the level of the daytime surface of the earth (before the start of earthworks):

To the top of the parapet 80.44 m;

From the mark of the adjacent territory to the floor of the first floor (0.000) 0.17 m;

From the mark of the adjacent territory to the mark of the bottom of the window opening of the upper floor 72.60 m.

In accordance with the Urban Development Plan of the land plot No. RU78100000-11878, the building does not exceed a maximum height of 85 m.

The building is a detached 25-storey residential multi-apartment section with a basement and a technical attic.

In the basement there are technical rooms for servicing the built-in office space and residential floors. The height of the floor is 2.8m, the height of the basement rooms in the cleanliness is 2.54m.

The basement has 2 emergency exits and two pits with a window measuring 1.3x0.9 (h), separate entrances to the fire extinguishing pump room and the ITP room are also provided.

Technical attic with a height of 1.8 m from the floor to the bottom of the ceiling. The technical space is used for laying engineering communications. The entrance to the technical attic is carried out from a non-smokeable staircase of the H-1 type through the vestibule.

On the ground floor there are built-in office premises ranging from 80 to 250 sq. m. The height of the floor is 4.3 m, the height of the office premises in cleanliness is 3.36 m.

The exits from each office are isolated from the residential part. Each office has bathrooms for MMGN.

Also on the ground floor are located: the entrance group of the residential part, the control room, combined with the concierge room and other technical premises that serve the residential building.

Accommodation of apartments is provided from the 2nd to the 25th floors. The height of the residential floor is 3.0m. The height of the residential part in cleanliness is 2.55 m, the height of common areas in cleanliness is 2.3m.

In accordance with the increased number of storeys, the building has a smoke-free staircase of the 1st type with a transition through the outer air zone and a separate exit to the street, as well as smoke removal from the floor corridors on each residential floor.

The building has 4 elevators to serve residents. These elevators have stops from the 1st to the 26th floor. Elevator No. 4, with a carrying capacity of 1000 kg, is intended for residents of the house and for transporting fire departments. The shaft of this elevator is isolated from the shafts of other elevators; air is provided in it. Lift doors for transportation of fire departments - EIS60. Doors of other elevators - EIS30.